|
I understand that stories of this type appear quiet often perhaps a cynical person might question if there is an attempt by some companies to "try it on". Lets face it the PPc companies are holding the revenue payable if they throw a few punches and withold the revenue who is going to stand up to them?
For a domain holder, the cost any of action for some could be disportionate, they may never have taken legal action before or the global PPC activity may inhibat.
For me suggestion a huge questions:
Are domain holds guilty and must they prove themselves innocent?
It also all nice and well for some domain holders to harp on about getting rid of people that have questionable revenue statistics (its not as if they dont have an interest).
Don't get me wrong I am not sticking up for any one of them, and it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if someone hasn't devised something to generate high activity.
I could also type about the quantitative analysis that may be deployed by PPC companies, but, that doesn't fully engineer business policy or even qualify the differing policies / statements that I have read on this forum.
What is also of concern is that some PPC companies dislike and even reject applications of domain holders if they belief the holders use other PPC companies.
To wrap it up, is this the face of PPC?
|