View Single Post
Old 09-01-2006, 08:07:48 PM     #5 (permalink)
olebean

 
olebean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Rarotonga
Posts: 2,240
olebean has a reputation beyond reputeolebean has a reputation beyond reputeolebean has a reputation beyond reputeolebean has a reputation beyond reputeolebean has a reputation beyond reputeolebean has a reputation beyond reputeolebean has a reputation beyond reputeolebean has a reputation beyond reputeolebean has a reputation beyond reputeolebean has a reputation beyond reputeolebean has a reputation beyond repute

Anything legal I agree with and not PPC companies using that as an excuse to withold payments, which is a plausible strategy.

If we refer back to clem on the original thread, the full statement from the company is not there nor are they here to discuss the issue, I would welcome their comments.

The terms "robot" or "fraudulent" appears very open to interpretation unless clem can suggest otherwise, I shall assume there was no proof of origin or linkage to clem. Does that mean there is guilt on clems part? I don't think so!

Undoubtably someone will be holding data if I were clem I would request that data. As I said earlier, if clem has been a naughty domain holder I have no simpathy.

I am interested why other domain holders blindly agree with propaganda from PPc companies when the PPC companies seem to provide no data, no evidence no nothing that supports claims that the industry is rife with fraudulent clickers.

If I am wrong and they have provided proof then please let me know..

Not even one legally proven case of click fraud..... I wonder why that is... Not even to use it as a deterent..

Last edited by olebean; 09-01-2006 at 08:11:02 PM.
olebean is offline