View Single Post
Old 06-06-2009, 11:04:51 AM     #15 (permalink)
rob
Founding Member
 
rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,878
rob has a reputation beyond reputerob has a reputation beyond reputerob has a reputation beyond reputerob has a reputation beyond reputerob has a reputation beyond reputerob has a reputation beyond reputerob has a reputation beyond reputerob has a reputation beyond reputerob has a reputation beyond reputerob has a reputation beyond reputerob has a reputation beyond repute

Quote:
Originally Posted by domainmonster_m View Post
Hi Rob

Until such time as the relevant brand owner wants that name, they are premium I'm afraid. No matter how moral we as a registrar about TM's there a lot of customers that do buy up TM's and are willing to pay a premium to do so. Its not our job to play sheriff, but supply the market with their demand. The registry's don't' hold them back at source and do allow them to auction at high value during TLD launches so the channel (eg: registrars) will of course do the same.

The important part is that we don't go about acquiring TM's and never will. We literally get stuck with these names, recognise that someone will pay a premium (Appreciate you guys won't, but we have them in the first place right!), so offer them back up for sale until such time as they drop. Any TM names will never renew with us, just see out the current shelf life.

In terms of the parking on these. They absolutely shouldn't be parked as TM's and I'll get this resolved. I can't speak specifically for SEDO, but its a key requirement of most ad partners, so we need to get this addressed. I would imagine their Name Servers have just remained un-touched since fraud or title passed over to us, so they all need reviewing and this will be done by our team early next week. We need to smarten up our process of placing them in premium domicile and this will come shortly.

Hope that helps some more! Rgds, Matt
Hi Matt,

I must say I am a little suprised by that reply, as basically its saying you are happy to profit from TM names but will hand them over / not renew them.

Cybersquatting and Typosquatting (from Domainmonster.com)
&
Cybersquatting Domain Names (from Domainmonster.com)

"In summary, cybersquatters and typosquatters are unethical companies and individuals that want to profit from your family’s and your own confusion and spelling mistakes."


As above, by offering them for sale to someone who is *not* the rights holder is simply encouraging others to cybersquat - surely that cannot be a good thing?

Cheers,
Rob.
rob is offline