View Single Post
Old 01-03-2006, 08:01:58 PM     #6 (permalink)
invincible

 
invincible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The Island of Mustique, St. Vincent & The Grenadines
Posts: 1,145
invincible has a reputation beyond reputeinvincible has a reputation beyond reputeinvincible has a reputation beyond reputeinvincible has a reputation beyond reputeinvincible has a reputation beyond reputeinvincible has a reputation beyond reputeinvincible has a reputation beyond reputeinvincible has a reputation beyond reputeinvincible has a reputation beyond reputeinvincible has a reputation beyond reputeinvincible has a reputation beyond repute

Quote:
Originally Posted by domaingenius
Yes interesting. So please may I ask Ed, do DRS decisions ,especially Appeals which have of course considered the facts twice, act as a type of precedent in future DRS's , and do they have to be taken into account in making future decisions , or can it be totally disregarded in future decisions ??.

DG
Each Independent Expert will form their decision differently. Some will examine past decisions and appeals. Some won't. I believe it is entirely up to an expert how they come to their decision, although the policy is there as guidance for what constitutes both rights and abusive registration.

Last edited by invincible; 02-03-2006 at 08:58:29 PM. Reason: tidied up my sentences
invincible is offline