View Single Post
Old 03-03-2006, 08:21:38 AM     #2 (permalink)
retired_member6
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,643
retired_member6 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member6 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member6 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member6 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member6 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member6 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member6 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member6 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member6 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member6 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member6 has a reputation beyond repute

Quote:
6. Without Prejudice

a. Documents and information which are 'without prejudice' (or are marked as being 'without prejudice') may be used in submissions and may be considered by the Expert except that the Expert will not consider such materials if:

i. they are generated within Informal Mediation; or

ii. the Expert believes that it is in the interests of justice that the document or information be excluded from consideration.
Could I effectively use 6 a i. to request the expert to consider not allowing the part causing the defamation of character and in doing so, removing that text from the decision process if the expert feels inclined to agree?
retired_member6 is offline