View Single Post
Old 30-08-2009, 01:34:07 PM     #9 (permalink)
woopwoop

 
woopwoop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,584
woopwoop has a reputation beyond reputewoopwoop has a reputation beyond reputewoopwoop has a reputation beyond reputewoopwoop has a reputation beyond reputewoopwoop has a reputation beyond reputewoopwoop has a reputation beyond reputewoopwoop has a reputation beyond reputewoopwoop has a reputation beyond reputewoopwoop has a reputation beyond reputewoopwoop has a reputation beyond reputewoopwoop has a reputation beyond repute

That's interesting. Also they probably had a chance to give up the names early and not have it go this far.

Quote:
Verizon is calling the case "the largest cyber squatting judgement ever" despite the fact that it is unlikely to recoup much in the way of damages from OnlineNIC.
This was said in the article but not explained. Why are they unlikely to recoup much in the way of damages? Isn't that the $33m?

Last edited by woopwoop; 30-08-2009 at 02:36:13 PM.
woopwoop is offline