Thread: Advice Please
View Single Post
Old 06-10-2009, 02:20:55 PM     #4 (permalink)
crabfoot

 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 821
crabfoot has a reputation beyond reputecrabfoot has a reputation beyond reputecrabfoot has a reputation beyond reputecrabfoot has a reputation beyond reputecrabfoot has a reputation beyond reputecrabfoot has a reputation beyond reputecrabfoot has a reputation beyond reputecrabfoot has a reputation beyond reputecrabfoot has a reputation beyond reputecrabfoot has a reputation beyond reputecrabfoot has a reputation beyond repute

There was a case recently where someone forced the handover of a domain, although the trademark was only recently registered.

If that happened in the US, there might be grounds to challenge the trademark if the domain had been used to trade in a similar business area for significant time (over 2 years), although the legal costs would be high.
The likely outcome would be a handover with significant "out of pocket expenses", ie a sale after bargaining over what it would cost the TM holder to get the domain through the courts.

Until recently, the entire matter was a Civil Dispute, so the legal argument could continue while the disputed site was "up and running".

The ICANN rules are changing to favour the TM holder - they only have to object to the name, and the registrar is obliged to take the site down.

So now the TM holder has you by the "short and curlies" - all you have to bargain with is that you are out of pocket, and pointing out that it would cost the TM holder money to take it to court.
__________________
Cloud Factories ppi-info
crabfoot is offline