Thanks netserve. The DRS is designed to be fair, too, of course. I rather hoped that that went without saying....but maybe not.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by netserve It would be nice to see a few cases where the respondent was as guilty as hell but the expert decided that the complaint didn't deliver a case that proved guilt. |
Well, I don't know about "guilty as hell" but there are certainly cases where the experts reject complaints that have not proved their case. One reasonably recently was (from memory) lhhscotland.co.uk, where if I remember rightly the Expert said (I paraphrase) 'you're the wrong complainant. If you'd have been the right one, you'd probably have won.'
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by netserve I've got a great deal of respect for the legal bods at Nomient but I'm not sure the DRS results come across in the right way. |
And that's what I'm trying to pin down. If there are no specific problems, just a general impression, I want to understand the root of that general impression. It may just be bad presentation, or it may track back to something else.