DRS is OUT!!!! Enjoy the read

grandin · 17-11-2006, 03:17:33 PM

Enjoy the read....Ed is out of the office for a little while

Updating the .uk Dispute Resolution Service

grandin · 17-11-2006, 03:22:17 PM

yawn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hazel Pegg · 17-11-2006, 03:41:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grandin

yawn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Were you expecting something more exciting?

Hazel

Whois-Search · 17-11-2006, 03:44:53 PM

This would be much better:

"Safeguards for the secondary market ("domainers")"

However:

"3. Introduce a system where the losing party pays for the decision"

Some people are going to love that one .......

static · 17-11-2006, 03:48:25 PM

"3. Introduce a system where the losing party pays for the decision"

Where does it say that?

Whois-Search · 17-11-2006, 03:51:06 PM

Scroll down on the first page:

Quote:

Fees

It has always been free to file a DRS complaint and the money paid for expert decisions is passed on to the independent experts. We do not charge for our administration and mediation services. Some people have suggested that the free system encourages poor quality complaints and we should perhaps charge an upfront fee.

Our proposed options on fees are:

1. No change
2. Introduce an upfront non-refundable fee (�50-100) and reduce the expert decision fee accordingly, to keep the change cash-flow neutral
3. Introduce a system where the losing party pays for the decision

So all of you with "dodgy names" need to reply about that one.

In a DRS case like bounce.co.uk you could end up paying �750 + �3000 + VAT for losing ?

What you going to do if I refuse to pay? Bankrupt a Member? Doesn't that make it free for a complainant in a certain case? At least with "pay upfront" the case doesn't go ahead unless you pay first.

olebean · 17-11-2006, 04:32:29 PM

IMO this is about as good as one could have expected... I am pleasantly surprised on first glance...

Quote:

3. Introduce a system where the losing party pays for the decision

With all respect to Nominet and some of you guys who picked up on it that is a none issue its too difficult to enforce (false details etc) and costs to pursue are too great...

SecNam · 17-11-2006, 04:33:50 PM

[quote=static;51774]"3. Introduce a system where the losing party pays for the decision"QUOTE]

now thats mad

sneezycheese · 17-11-2006, 04:37:03 PM

And...

Quote:

Abusive registrations

Include a likelihood of confusion as evidence of an abusive registration i.e. soften the test at 3(a)(ii) ('has confused').
State that the abusive use does not have to be ongoing for the purposes of Policy 3(a)(iii) - it is enough that abusive use has occurred in the past.

Appeals

Shorten appeal timelines, so that a Notice of Intention to Appeal gives another two weeks, not another three weeks.

Drafting

Clarify some terms (e.g. rename 'Abusive Registration' as 'Unfair Registration' as was done by the New Zealand DRS), and rewrite generally in 'Plain English'.

...I know what kind of message I get from this and what's been previously mentioned - Anyone else get the same 'feeling'?

sneezycheese · 17-11-2006, 04:41:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by olebean

With all respect to Nominet and some of you guys who picked up on it that is a none issue its too difficult to enforce (false details etc) and costs to pursue are too great...

...Agreed - If I was to get a bill (and subsequent 'Small Claims' C.C. Claim) for costs, I would be filing a counter claim straight away (financially it's a 'no brainer')!

In addtion, I believe that this would hold ZERO water for those 'consumer' types that Nominet dislikes so much!

17-11-2006, 03:17:33 PM	#1 (permalink)
grandin Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 1,273 No Classified Ratings Domain Trader Rating: (100% / 26)	DRS is OUT!!!! Enjoy the read Enjoy the read....Ed is out of the office for a little while Updating the .uk Dispute Resolution Service __________________ Buy To Let Mortgages Buy To Let mortgages Discount Mortgages landlord insurance student loan Commercial Mortgages Fixed Mortgages UK Hotels UK Holidays

17-11-2006, 03:22:17 PM	#2 (permalink)
grandin Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 1,273 No Classified Ratings Domain Trader Rating: (100% / 26)	yawn!!! yawn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Last edited by grandin; 17-11-2006 at 03:27:52 PM.

17-11-2006, 03:44:53 PM	#4 (permalink)
Whois-Search Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Swad.com Posts: 1,480 No Classified Ratings Domain Trader Rating: (100% / 2)	This would be much better: "Safeguards for the secondary market ("domainers")" However: "3. Introduce a system where the losing party pays for the decision" Some people are going to love that one ....... __________________ Andrew Bennett - www.whois-search.com Linkedin: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/andrewgbennett

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Domain Name Community	Replies	Last Post
everyone needs to read this	pred	General Board	2	25-08-2006 10:31:09 AM
Read this first	admin	Domain Appraisals	0	28-03-2005 07:03:43 PM

17-11-2006, 03:48:25 PM	#5 (permalink)
static Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 220 No Classified Ratings Domain Trader Rating: (0% / 0)	"3. Introduce a system where the losing party pays for the decision" Where does it say that?

17-11-2006, 04:33:50 PM	#8 (permalink)
SecNam Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 4,206 Classified Rating: 100% (1) Domain Trader Rating: (100% / 44)	[quote=static;51774]"3. Introduce a system where the losing party pays for the decision"QUOTE] now thats mad