Buy Sell Discuss UK Domain Names at AcornDomains.co.uk Free Virtual Servers

Today's Drop Dates are: 18-02-2012 or 25-02-2012   All times are GMT. The time now is 08:53:37 AM.
Domain Name Sales Domain Software Calculate UK Domain Drop Dates Domain Registration NameDrive Domain Parking Subscribe to our Domains For Sale newsletter
Go Back   Domain Forum Acorn Domains Buy Sell Auction UK Domains > Domain Name Disputes & Scams > Domain Name Disputes
Connect with Facebook

Domain Name Disputes Discuss domain disputes, Nominet DRS or UDRP

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17-12-2006, 04:33:02 PM     #1 (permalink)

 
Whois-Search's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Swad.com
Posts: 1,480
Whois-Search has a reputation beyond reputeWhois-Search has a reputation beyond reputeWhois-Search has a reputation beyond reputeWhois-Search has a reputation beyond reputeWhois-Search has a reputation beyond reputeWhois-Search has a reputation beyond reputeWhois-Search has a reputation beyond reputeWhois-Search has a reputation beyond reputeWhois-Search has a reputation beyond reputeWhois-Search has a reputation beyond reputeWhois-Search has a reputation beyond repute

Can a DRS consultation reply be used against you?

When you make a reply to the DRS consultation, your comment gets listed on the bottom of the page:

Updating the .uk Dispute Resolution Service

Google then picks up the pdf. Example:

chris holland drs - Google Search

Can your comments in that then be used in a future DRS as evidance of abuse?

Also if I replied to the DRS consultation say in favour of domainers and then I stood for the PAB in March..... someone would just quote me on nom-steer.

Should these comments remain private? Or do you just have to watch what you say and take the risk.
__________________
Andrew Bennett - www.whois-search.com
Linkedin: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/andrewgbennett
Whois-Search is offline  
Old 17-12-2006, 05:05:30 PM     #2 (permalink)
rob
Founding Member
 
rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,976
rob has a reputation beyond reputerob has a reputation beyond reputerob has a reputation beyond reputerob has a reputation beyond reputerob has a reputation beyond reputerob has a reputation beyond reputerob has a reputation beyond reputerob has a reputation beyond reputerob has a reputation beyond reputerob has a reputation beyond reputerob has a reputation beyond repute

CH's reply is a gem

To balance the situation where a three time losing respondent has the automatic assumption of bad faith presumed against him (or "her" if it is one of these new phantom tags in the names of existing tagholder's girlfriends, wives, cats and landladies etc), we would like for a penalty to be imposed on a sliding scale pro rata to the predatory complainant's annual published turnover if a finding of "attempted reverse domain name hijacking" is determined by the expert. So if a £5bn annual turnover FSTE 100 member attempts to steal my trainers.co.uk domain on the basis of an expired Ecuadorian trademark and is found to have tried to reverse domain name hijack my valuable property, they should pay a penalty of £5,000 or £10,000. This payment should be made directly to the winning respondent.

rob is offline  
Old 17-12-2006, 05:15:18 PM     #3 (permalink)

 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,387
domaingenius has a reputation beyond reputedomaingenius has a reputation beyond reputedomaingenius has a reputation beyond reputedomaingenius has a reputation beyond reputedomaingenius has a reputation beyond reputedomaingenius has a reputation beyond reputedomaingenius has a reputation beyond reputedomaingenius has a reputation beyond reputedomaingenius has a reputation beyond reputedomaingenius has a reputation beyond reputedomaingenius has a reputation beyond repute

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whois-Search View Post
When you make a reply to the DRS consultation, your comment gets listed on the bottom of the page:

Updating the .uk Dispute Resolution Service

Google then picks up the pdf. Example:

chris holland drs - Google Search

Can your comments in that then be used in a future DRS as evidance of abuse?

Also if I replied to the DRS consultation say in favour of domainers and then I stood for the PAB in March..... someone would just quote me on nom-steer.

Should these comments remain private? Or do you just have to watch what you say and take the risk.
Is there any warning that such responses will be published on the Nominet website ???. If not then I think that the Information Commissioner may well be looking at the website. It is *perhaps* OK if they advise you before hand, but I think that Nominet have a cheek to publish such comments and what really is the purpose of putting them on the website .

DG
domaingenius is offline  
Old 18-12-2006, 10:01:23 AM     #4 (permalink)

 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,273
grandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond repute

DRS views

DG I think you are being paranoid. The Consultation is open to anyone to give views on how to construct a workable DRS.

You have to follow rules under the contract, views do not constitute a breach of rules.

I would be more concerned with any views posted under Acorn.

I have written a part 1 of a 2 part but I have left it at home today. I will file it tomorrow.

Lee
grandin is offline  
Old 18-12-2006, 10:20:25 AM     #5 (permalink)

 
Beasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 616
Beasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond repute

Quote:
Originally Posted by grandin View Post
DG I think you are being paranoid. The Consultation is open to anyone to give views on how to construct a workable DRS.

You have to follow rules under the contract, views do not constitute a breach of rules.

I would be more concerned with any views posted under Acorn.

I have written a part 1 of a 2 part but I have left it at home today. I will file it tomorrow.

Lee
I agree with Lee. I am sure if you want your opinions kept confidential, Nominet would do it. However in general I think giving everyone an idea of the type and numbers of responses is a good thing - so everyone can see the actual opinions expressed, as well as any analysis done on them.
Beasty is offline  
Old 18-12-2006, 12:51:49 PM     #6 (permalink)

 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,273
grandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond repute

Ashes

Ashes?

Are you back home beasty?

Lee
grandin is offline  
Old 18-12-2006, 01:06:25 PM     #7 (permalink)

 
Beasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 616
Beasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond repute

Quote:
Originally Posted by grandin View Post
Ashes?

Are you back home beasty?

Lee
No - I'm a sucker for punishment!
Beasty is offline  
Old 18-12-2006, 01:41:24 PM     #8 (permalink)

 
olebean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Rarotonga
Posts: 2,240
olebean has a reputation beyond reputeolebean has a reputation beyond reputeolebean has a reputation beyond reputeolebean has a reputation beyond reputeolebean has a reputation beyond reputeolebean has a reputation beyond reputeolebean has a reputation beyond reputeolebean has a reputation beyond reputeolebean has a reputation beyond reputeolebean has a reputation beyond reputeolebean has a reputation beyond repute

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beasty View Post
No - I'm a sucker for punishment!
The Aussies people that bad (or good depending on the disposition to punshment)


OB
olebean is offline  
Closed Thread



Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Domain Name Community Replies Last Post
Domain administrator criticised over consultation - ZDNet.com.au RSS Domain Name News 1 28-03-2006 09:53:39 AM
DRS Reply Address retired_member6 Domain Name Disputes 4 25-03-2006 07:09:43 PM

75% off Domains at Network Solutions®.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:53:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 2
All content on Acorn Domains is member generated and is not moderated before posting. All content is viewed and used by you at your own risk and AD does not warrant the accuracy or reliability of any of the information. The views expressed are those of the individual contributors and not necessarily those of AD. Please contact us to report any issues or send a PM to "Admin".