Buy Sell Discuss UK Domain Names at AcornDomains.co.uk

Today's Drop Dates are: 18-02-2012 or 25-02-2012   All times are GMT. The time now is 08:55:05 AM.
Domain Name Sales Domain Software Calculate UK Domain Drop Dates Domain Registration NameDrive Domain Parking Subscribe to our Domains For Sale newsletter
Go Back   Domain Forum Acorn Domains Buy Sell Auction UK Domains > Domain Name Disputes & Scams > Domain Name Disputes
Connect with Facebook

Domain Name Disputes Discuss domain disputes, Nominet DRS or UDRP

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25-01-2007, 02:42:45 PM     #1 (permalink)

 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 823
Nigel has a reputation beyond reputeNigel has a reputation beyond reputeNigel has a reputation beyond reputeNigel has a reputation beyond reputeNigel has a reputation beyond reputeNigel has a reputation beyond reputeNigel has a reputation beyond reputeNigel has a reputation beyond reputeNigel has a reputation beyond reputeNigel has a reputation beyond reputeNigel has a reputation beyond repute

3 Cases Complainant table

Question for Nominet

You've decided to publish a '3 cases respondent table'. Shouldn't you also publish a '3 cases complainant table' to balance this issue? i.e. if a complainant fails in 3 separate DRSs shouldn't that be reported in exactly the same way?

Anyone elses views welcome on this.
Nigel is offline  
Old 25-01-2007, 04:04:23 PM     #2 (permalink)

 
Beasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 616
Beasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond reputeBeasty has a reputation beyond repute

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nigel View Post
Question for Nominet

You've decided to publish a '3 cases respondent table'. Shouldn't you also publish a '3 cases complainant table' to balance this issue? i.e. if a complainant fails in 3 separate DRSs shouldn't that be reported in exactly the same way?

Anyone elses views welcome on this.
Reverse domain hijacking decisions are as rare as hens teeth Nigel - so much so that I seldom plead it unless I have spare words and it is really worth it.

Nice idea though, in the interests of balance. But with so few decisions going against complainants, would there be anyone on the table!
Beasty is offline  
Closed Thread



Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Domain Name Community Replies Last Post
Morgan Stanley Vs Meow (Felix domesticus) retired member 1 Domain Name Disputes 5 03-05-2007 07:55:14 PM
3 Cases Respondent Table Whois-Search Domain Name Disputes 21 14-01-2007 09:33:55 PM
The PAB's mandate. Jac Domain Name Disputes 46 06-09-2006 02:58:06 PM
mercer.co.uk DRS Whois-Search Domain Name Disputes 39 04-09-2006 05:45:40 PM
Complainant v Response Techniques retired_member6 Domain Name Disputes 0 18-06-2006 02:37:24 PM

Web Hosting from UK2 from just 99p


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:55:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 2
All content on Acorn Domains is member generated and is not moderated before posting. All content is viewed and used by you at your own risk and AD does not warrant the accuracy or reliability of any of the information. The views expressed are those of the individual contributors and not necessarily those of AD. Please contact us to report any issues or send a PM to "Admin".