DRS 04363 saralee.co.uk

Whois-Search · 29-03-2007, 04:17:29 PM

Yet another interesting case:

http://www.nic.uk/digitalAssets/17322_saralee.pdf

This time it's the name of an unborn daughter and Nominet deleting the name from the food company he worked for and re-registering it in his own name! Nice try lol

However it does raise some technical questions.......

He could have called any human or animal "Sara Lee"? He didn't offer to sell it and wasn't using parking pages? Also can you be linked to a previous legal registrant of a domain name?

Also should the expert say this "Leaving aside the exact circumstances in which the Domain Name was deleted" ?

Beasty · 01-04-2007, 04:04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whois-Search

Yet another interesting case:

http://www.nic.uk/digitalAssets/17322_saralee.pdf

This time it's the name of an unborn daughter and Nominet deleting the name from the food company he worked for and re-registering it in his own name! Nice try lol

However it does raise some technical questions.......

He could have called any human or animal "Sara Lee"? He didn't offer to sell it and wasn't using parking pages? Also can you be linked to a previous legal registrant of a domain name?

Also should the expert say this "Leaving aside the exact circumstances in which the Domain Name was deleted" ?

I have to say I agree with the decision in this case.

Nikki · 07-05-2007, 07:45:30 PM

it was too many coincident; besides, the domain name was never in use. So I think I agree with the expert.

I think in order to make a response, a respondent needs to find every reason against the complaint; even in this case, the unborn-child can be raised as a defense. How interesting is it?

29-03-2007, 04:17:29 PM	#1 (permalink)
Whois-Search Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Swad.com Posts: 1,480 No Classified Ratings Domain Trader Rating: (100% / 2)	DRS 04363 saralee.co.uk Yet another interesting case: http://www.nic.uk/digitalAssets/17322_saralee.pdf This time it's the name of an unborn daughter and Nominet deleting the name from the food company he worked for and re-registering it in his own name! Nice try lol However it does raise some technical questions....... He could have called any human or animal "Sara Lee"? He didn't offer to sell it and wasn't using parking pages? Also can you be linked to a previous legal registrant of a domain name? Also should the expert say this "Leaving aside the exact circumstances in which the Domain Name was deleted" ? __________________ Andrew Bennett - www.whois-search.com Linkedin: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/andrewgbennett

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

07-05-2007, 07:45:30 PM	#3 (permalink)
Nikki Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: everywhere Posts: 34 No Classified Ratings Domain Trader Rating: (0% / 0)	it was too many coincident; besides, the domain name was never in use. So I think I agree with the expert. I think in order to make a response, a respondent needs to find every reason against the complaint; even in this case, the unborn-child can be raised as a defense. How interesting is it?