paul

The more I think about it the more I think Beasty must be right. Maybe we should put a little story together for the press, this is the sort of thing they love. See how Nominet like it when the tables are turned.

retired_member11

Putting this default idea to one side just for a moment, is it known approximately when the new Policy will go live and will it give more scope for sellers to actively market their names without fear of of a Complaint being made?

grandin

My default Transfer Request:-

The Registrant has registered a common word as a domain name ending .co.uk. The Complainant has equal rights in the common word and the Registrant is not making fair use the domain name as it does not host a website and it resembles a blank page. The Complainant considers a blank page to be offensive and therefore abusive.

The Complainant orders the transfer of common word domain name to a more wanting party i.e. the Complainant.

Lee

__________________
Buy To Let Mortgages Buy To Let mortgages Discount Mortgages landlord insurance
student loan Commercial Mortgages Fixed Mortgages UK Hotels UK Holidays

Whois-Search

If you look at the respondents in the decisions table:

http://www.nic.uk/disputes/drs/decisions/decisions4001/

The registrants constantly causing the 'no response' problem are those already in the 3 cases respondent table:

http://www.nic.uk/disputes/drs/decisions/3cases/

Therefore why doesn't Nominet only apply the "default transfer process" to those who have had 3 cases against them?

__________________
Andrew Bennett
www.whois-search.com - www.whois-register.com - www.domain-shop.co.uk

Johnp

A sound suggestion. I had thought of that myself but being somewhat of a mischief, was looking forward to a few speculative DRS's at £ 10.00 a pop.

However I still have issue with the time limits on a DRS case, I personally feel these to be too onerous on the respondant. Perhaps a 30 day grace period where the domain is suspended should be introduced to focus minds on going through the mediation process, before the complainant is allowed to pay the fee (whether this be £ 200.00 or £ 750.00)


Best Regards


JohnP

Johnp

Just had seconds thoughts on that - 30 day suspension only for the '3 respondants' table registrants (just spotted this would allow any malicious DRS case to take a site off air for 30 days - opps). Other than that an additional 30 days to get a response in would I think be welcome for all of us that don't sit by the letter box.


Best Regards


JohnP

grantw

A good idea but that would publicise the registrants that the default transfer process applies to and would surely lead to people PRSSing the registrants and launching multiple DRS cases on their best domains in the hope that they continue to not bother responding?

We all spotted that this 'default transfer process' is full of massive holes within 2 minutes of reading the consultation paper, If this was discussed in depth by Nominet and noone raised the points we have it is very worrying indeed!


Grant

__________________
Domain Brokerage :: Bulk UK Whois :: Property Insurance