| what i want to see
What i want to see is another case like bounce...
bounce in my opinion was abusive in the sense it was parked gaining revnue from what is a non natural search term however the right did not belong unequivocally to the complainant therefore a transfer was wrong. In this case the registrant broke the conditions of contract and the domain name should of been cancelled and made reavailable on a first come first served basis AND if the registrant was a serial re-offender then he/she should be barred in law from repeatedly using a tool of deception....as this what not the case then this is mere fiction and not fact
Lee
|