invincible

Anyone willing to start dissecting why this one went the way it did?

Decisions

Taken from the Decision:

* Complainant claimed to have written to Respondent at address obtained from WHOIS but had their letter returned marked "gone away".
* Respondent had been using the WHOIS address opt-out which is only for use by Individuals who are non-trading. Nominet removed this but Expert mentioned this in his summing ups.
* Respondent had been publishing links, from a parking company, via the domain name, for clothing and fashion items. These items relate directly to the trade mark of the Complainant.
* Respondent didn't respond (reminds me of bounce.co.uk)

bb99

I read it earlier this evening - it's an extraordinarily long decision (16 pages) given that there was no response.

Maybe a case of the expert liking the sound of his own voice, or maybe a case of Nominet covering its arse. Oh no, it can't be the latter because the DRS is independent of Nominet

[comment removed just in case ]

__________________
Droppr - finely tuned .uk dropcatching for Nominet members
Gazebos | Flyers, Postcards | Tree Surveys | Dent Repairs Leeds | Poster Printing

mofo

I have a feeling it's not quite over - might be unwise to comment on it just yet.

foz

Respondent had been publishing links, from a parking company, via the domain name, for clothing and fashion items. These items relate directly to the trade mark of the Complainant

That would have done it.

apd

I don't see how. The Respondent did everything he possible could to lose the case.

__________________
Domain Names For Sale

admin

This matter is still in process so I have been asked to close the thread.

__________________
Domain Appraisal | Domain Escrow Service | UK Appliances | Surrey Deals | Domain Auctions from Acorn Domains
Subscribe to our Domains For Sale newsletter :: Submit a Domain For Sale to our newsletter :: Domains For Sale