Buy Sell Discuss UK Domain Names at AcornDomains.co.uk

Today's Drop Dates are: 07-11-2011 or 14-11-2011   All times are GMT. The time now is 09:31:32 PM.
Domain Name Sales Domain Software Calculate UK Domain Drop Dates Domain Registration NameDrive Domain Parking Subscribe to our Domains For Sale newsletter
Go Back   Domain Forum Acorn Domains Buy Sell Auction UK Domains > Domain Name Disputes & Scams > Domain Name Disputes
Connect with Facebook

Domain Name Disputes Discuss domain disputes, Nominet DRS or UDRP

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18-11-2009, 11:22:08 AM     #11 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3
paully is on a distinguished road

Thanks all for your time, and the good advice. Much appreciated.

Quote:
Originally Posted by namealot View Post
Did they give any reason for the u turn you really need to know why? This could happen with any site you have that has there product on it…? Ask them it may also help with stop future misunderstanding. (you need to know were you stand regarding any future site)
We rang the manufacturer up and told them we were using the domain - they didn't tell us we couldn't use it and added a link to our site from their own. However, we didn't talk to the MD of the company (who is impossibly difficult to get hold of). I think one of three things happened here:
1. They have been told by their parent company (who actually owns the trademark) that we were not allowed to use the domain.
2. They have been put under pressure from a larger account who doesn't like us using the manufacturer's trademark.
3. The MD of the company was not made aware by his staff at the time that we were using the domain.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleTap View Post
I know this will sound harsh, but from a business perspective, you have been quite naive. I wouldn't say you've been passing off, but I can't see how you have not been trading off their trademark, you must see that, surely? Put it down to experience, hand it over for free (don't 301 it), and maintain a healthy relationship with your supplier.
I agree with hindsight we possibly have been a bit naive, our e-commerce is in its infancy, but at the time we did not think trading off their trademark was a problem - as we regularly fill our high street shop with banners and POS material with their trademark on - which they obviously encourage. We also thought there would not be a problem as all products sold through the website were theirs - it’s not like we are taking money off them! They were benefiting from our sales as much, if not more, than we are. They are not retailer and do not sell to the public, so even though their trademark is used in the domain name - the domain name as a whole (Their trademark+'shop.co.uk') is not applicable to them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bb99 View Post
You may find the recent DRS decision on HeritageBathrooms.co.uk of interest. I can't link to it directly but if you click on this:

Decisions Search

then select 'domain name' and put 'heritagebathrooms.co.uk' in the box and search for it, you will be able to download the PDF.

This DRS deals with a case whereby a company has said "it's OK to use our TM in your domain name" and then later changed their mind.

Obviously each case is taken on its own merits but the expert talks at length about whether or not the DRS should be used to settle what could boil down to a contractual dispute. In this case he takes no action and suggests the whole thing would be better dealt with in court.
Thanks for pointing this case out, it looks very interesting. It looks like the defendant in that case had a written agreement with the trademark holder though - which we don't have, but in our mind the fact that they linked their website to ours as 'an authorised stockist' would demonstrate that we had a verbal conversation with them regarding the domain and that, at the time, they were happy with it.

I had read a similar case on the Nominet DRS regarding Seiko watches. The defendant had Seikoshop.co.uk - however he wasn't selling through his website, but used the domain to promote his high street shop, and the claimant (Seiko) successfully argued that they might not be selling their watches when the customer comes to the defendants shop.

Also there is this case regarding Volvospares.com which went through the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center, which seems very similar to our case. The panel concluded that although the defendant knew about the claimant’s trademark, they could not find any evidence that the defendant was misrepresenting the claimant’s trademark and that they had a legitimate business interest with using the domain. WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2008-1860

All that said though, the issue for us is, as you all correctly point out, losing the supplier. Even if we were to win any case brought before the Nominet DRS or other courts, if it results in us losing, or damaging our relationship with the supplier it would obviously not be worth it. If the courts did rule in our favour, I am not sure they can just stop supplying us, as I can’t see how they would prove that we breeched contract. But obviously there is no guarantee that we would win the case, far from it.

Like Jasman, Skinner and Nickynoodles suggest, I think we will write a letter back to their solicitors that we are willing to give up the domain in order to keep our strong business relationship. However, do you think we are pushing our luck to ask for any compensation considering they were fine with the domain for 9 months and knowingly let us spend money developing the site only to now take it away from us? Let’s not forget they were happy enough when the orders were coming in and they were making their money of the site too.
paully is offline  
Old 18-11-2009, 11:40:09 AM     #12 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 95
nickynoodles is a splendid one to beholdnickynoodles is a splendid one to beholdnickynoodles is a splendid one to beholdnickynoodles is a splendid one to beholdnickynoodles is a splendid one to beholdnickynoodles is a splendid one to beholdnickynoodles is a splendid one to behold

Quote:
Originally Posted by paully View Post
However, do you think we are pushing our luck to ask for any compensation considering they were fine with the domain for 9 months
Yes .. Ask, as a compromise, that they take control of the domain but redirect all links and traffic to your new site. You'll get out of the Google sandbox quicker using a new domain.

If that's still no go, just hand it over and move on.

racketzone.co.uk is dropping in a week's time btw
nickynoodles is offline  
Old 18-11-2009, 11:52:55 AM     #13 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3
paully is on a distinguished road

Quote:
Originally Posted by nickynoodles View Post
Yes .. Ask, as a compromise, that they take control of the domain but redirect all links and traffic to your new site. You'll get out of the Google sandbox quicker using a new domain.

If that's still no go, just hand it over and move on.
Ok, thanks again for the advice.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nickynoodles View Post
racketzone.co.uk is dropping in a week's time btw
awesome thanks for the heads up!
paully is offline  
Old 18-11-2009, 11:58:09 AM     #14 (permalink)

 
accelerator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: England
Posts: 4,764
accelerator has a reputation beyond reputeaccelerator has a reputation beyond reputeaccelerator has a reputation beyond reputeaccelerator has a reputation beyond reputeaccelerator has a reputation beyond reputeaccelerator has a reputation beyond reputeaccelerator has a reputation beyond reputeaccelerator has a reputation beyond reputeaccelerator has a reputation beyond reputeaccelerator has a reputation beyond reputeaccelerator has a reputation beyond repute

You never got proper permission to use the domain in the first place. You should have had a signed agreement from someone in the organisation capable of giving permission. So, I don't think asking for compensation would be realistic.

Rgds
accelerator is offline  
Old 18-11-2009, 12:03:23 PM     #15 (permalink)

 
retired_member12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,510
retired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond repute

Quote:
Originally Posted by paully View Post
I agree with hindsight we possibly have been a bit naive, our e-commerce is in its infancy, but at the time we did not think trading off their trademark was a problem - as we regularly fill our high street shop with banners and POS material with their trademark on - which they obviously encourage. We also thought there would not be a problem as all products sold through the website were theirs - it’s not like we are taking money off them! They were benefiting from our sales as much, if not more, than we are. They are not retailer and do not sell to the public, so even though their trademark is used in the domain name - the domain name as a whole (Their trademark+'shop.co.uk') is not applicable to them.
I don't think there is any doubt about your good intentions, and clearly things have worked well until recently. However, the reality is that they've already been through the mill trying to get the other domain name back, and I suspect they've also had to learn quickly from that experience, as you are now. The plain fact is, they are duty bound to protect their IP in all its forms, be that TM or Patent. It just so happens that as they have wised up to this fact, your efforts will be a casualty.
retired_member12 is offline  
Old 18-11-2009, 04:58:07 PM     #16 (permalink)

 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 476
jasman has a reputation beyond reputejasman has a reputation beyond reputejasman has a reputation beyond reputejasman has a reputation beyond reputejasman has a reputation beyond reputejasman has a reputation beyond reputejasman has a reputation beyond reputejasman has a reputation beyond reputejasman has a reputation beyond reputejasman has a reputation beyond reputejasman has a reputation beyond repute

Another option is to move the site onto a new domain immediately, and 301 redirect the old domain to it. Then drag the negotiations out a little to give Google enough time to replace the old domain's rankings with the new one's.

Keep all correspondance by letter, not email. If they ask why, say you prefer to keep hard copies for all legal correspondence. Each time you send a letter, and wait for their reply, and then send your reply to that, it's going to be about another week. So if you can drag it out so several letters are exchanged you should get a few weeks while Google realizes the domain forwards to the new site. Even after the domain is in their possession it may take them a while to change the nameservers giving you even more time.

So initially you might send a letter making it clear that you will transfer the domain over to them as you respect their need to protect their TM, but don't give any details other than that. Then wait for reply. You might then reply to their letter saying something like you just need your web designer to download a backup of the website before transferring the domain over and you expect that to be in the next few days. They reply saying whatever. Then you send another letter saying you now have a backup, but ask which email address the domain should be transferred to etc. Eventually, you hand over the domain, but your new site is the one coming up in Google.

This way, instead of asking them if you can have a month to redirect the old domain to the new (to keep the ranking you have built up in the search engines), you effectively take a month - or at least a few weeks anyway. So they don't even get a chance to say 'no'. Don't take the piss dragging it out too much though, you don't want to annoy them and risk being cut off! As in all areas of life, walk a fine line...

Last edited by jasman; 18-11-2009 at 05:00:28 PM.
jasman is offline  
Closed Thread



Bookmarks

Tags
domain names, intellectual porperty, trade marks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Domain Name Community Replies Last Post
United States: World Intellectual Property Organization Announces ... - Mondaq News A RSS Domain Name News 0 08-04-2009 01:00:44 PM
Intellectual Property Pointers for Enterprising E-Tailers - E-Commerce Times RSS Domain Name News 0 23-10-2008 11:59:01 AM
Complaints rise last year over domain names - Toronto Star RSS Domain Name News 0 18-03-2007 08:59:23 AM
Complaints rise last year over domain names - Toronto Star RSS Domain Name News 0 13-03-2007 09:59:07 AM
Lawyers warn of domain name scam stevie Domain Name Scams 0 01-11-2005 11:20:35 PM

Reseller Hosting


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:31:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 2
All content on Acorn Domains is member generated and is not moderated before posting. All content is viewed and used by you at your own risk and AD does not warrant the accuracy or reliability of any of the information. The views expressed are those of the individual contributors and not necessarily those of AD. Please contact us to report any issues or send a PM to "Admin".