Buy Sell Discuss UK Domain Names at AcornDomains.co.uk

Today's Drop Dates are: 07-11-2011 or 14-11-2011   All times are GMT. The time now is 09:18:57 PM.
Domain Name Sales Domain Software Calculate UK Domain Drop Dates Domain Registration NameDrive Domain Parking Subscribe to our Domains For Sale newsletter
Go Back   Domain Forum Acorn Domains Buy Sell Auction UK Domains > Domain Name Disputes & Scams > Domain Name Disputes
Connect with Facebook

Domain Name Disputes Discuss domain disputes, Nominet DRS or UDRP

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17-02-2010, 12:25:31 PM     #11 (permalink)

 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 752
dashu1 has a reputation beyond reputedashu1 has a reputation beyond reputedashu1 has a reputation beyond reputedashu1 has a reputation beyond reputedashu1 has a reputation beyond reputedashu1 has a reputation beyond reputedashu1 has a reputation beyond reputedashu1 has a reputation beyond reputedashu1 has a reputation beyond reputedashu1 has a reputation beyond reputedashu1 has a reputation beyond repute

The verbatim one is a good one, I also found autoclaimsdirect interesting too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by foz View Post
They sound like a pack of bullies to me.

If you still have a chance reply with a response. You can do this on-line by logging into your account and uploading a .doc file.

Don't assume the Expert knows about all the aspects of the domain business.

Quote cases in the past that have been favourable to respondents. I believe verbatim.co.uk has some good material in it. e.g. "not bad faith to park and sell domains". Also cyclone.co.uk has some nuggets.
dashu1 is offline  
Old 17-02-2010, 12:50:58 PM     #12 (permalink)
foz

 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NZ
Posts: 1,450
foz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond repute

Appeals ghd.co.uk, mercer.co.uk & oasis.co.uk.

Mercer.co.uk - Expert stated;
Quote:
"Trading in domain names for profit is a well established business and unexceptionable."
unexceptionable = completely acceptable or beyond reproach.
foz is offline  
Old 17-02-2010, 12:56:13 PM     #13 (permalink)

 
bensd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Posts: 3,955
bensd has a reputation beyond reputebensd has a reputation beyond reputebensd has a reputation beyond reputebensd has a reputation beyond reputebensd has a reputation beyond reputebensd has a reputation beyond reputebensd has a reputation beyond reputebensd has a reputation beyond reputebensd has a reputation beyond reputebensd has a reputation beyond reputebensd has a reputation beyond repute

Quote:
Originally Posted by foz View Post
unexceptionable = completely acceptable or beyond reproach.
Thanks for that. I'm sure there would be other thickos like me who would have needed to look that up
bensd is offline  
Old 17-02-2010, 01:06:29 PM     #14 (permalink)
foz

 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NZ
Posts: 1,450
foz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond repute

Quote:
Originally Posted by bensd View Post
Thanks for that. I'm sure there would be other thickos like me who would have needed to look that up
I used Google define:
foz is offline  
Old 17-02-2010, 03:51:02 PM     #15 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 42
wiposucks has much to be proud ofwiposucks has much to be proud ofwiposucks has much to be proud ofwiposucks has much to be proud ofwiposucks has much to be proud ofwiposucks has much to be proud ofwiposucks has much to be proud ofwiposucks has much to be proud ofwiposucks has much to be proud ofwiposucks has much to be proud of

Hmm, I would say that unexceptional means "commonplace/practice", unless he meant to say "unacceptable" lol.

WS
wiposucks is offline  
Old 17-02-2010, 03:59:24 PM     #16 (permalink)

 
retired_member12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,510
retired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond repute

Getting back to the point in hand, I find it hard to take on board the mentality of a company that offers to buy a domain name from DB in the first place, but just because it didn't like the price, it decides that selling is suddenly wrong and issues a DRS claim against him instead, citing selling domains within the claim as being wrong. Cheeky bleeders!
retired_member12 is offline  
Old 17-02-2010, 04:02:44 PM     #17 (permalink)
foz

 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NZ
Posts: 1,450
foz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond repute

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleTap View Post
Getting back to the point in hand, I find it hard to take on board the mentality of a company that offers to buy a domain name from DB in the first place, but just because it didn't like the price, it decides that selling is suddenly wrong and issues a DRS claim against him instead, citing selling domains within the claim as being wrong. Cheeky bleeders!
An offer that was the same as a summary decision. But I agree.
foz is offline  
Old 17-02-2010, 04:07:36 PM     #18 (permalink)

 
retired_member12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,510
retired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond reputeretired_member12 has a reputation beyond repute

Quote:
Originally Posted by foz View Post
An offer that was the same as a summary decision...
Hmmm, good point. I wonder if they realise the price of a full decision?
retired_member12 is offline  
Old 17-02-2010, 04:17:07 PM     #19 (permalink)

 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: "Up North" and Orlando
Posts: 235
bluerock has a reputation beyond reputebluerock has a reputation beyond reputebluerock has a reputation beyond reputebluerock has a reputation beyond reputebluerock has a reputation beyond reputebluerock has a reputation beyond reputebluerock has a reputation beyond reputebluerock has a reputation beyond reputebluerock has a reputation beyond reputebluerock has a reputation beyond reputebluerock has a reputation beyond repute

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleTap View Post
Getting back to the point in hand, I find it hard to take on board the mentality of a company that offers to buy a domain name from DB in the first place, but just because it didn't like the price, it decides that selling is suddenly wrong and issues a DRS claim against him instead, citing selling domains within the claim as being wrong. Cheeky bleeders!
I had a d r s last month after sedo negotiations broke down!
I wanted them to pay for expert but they backed down.
Best thing is they then emailed and said okay we'll pay sedo price!!!!

Planks
bluerock is offline  
Old 17-02-2010, 04:25:00 PM     #20 (permalink)
foz

 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NZ
Posts: 1,450
foz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond reputefoz has a reputation beyond repute

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleTap View Post
Hmmm, good point. I wonder if they realise the price of a full decision?
It does seem to be explained well Help

What I don't like is that if an ill conceived Complaint (on the notion it will only cost £200) is laid, the Respondent has to go to considerable cost and time to file a response (as they only have one shot to put their argument across).

Whereas when it was a flat £750, Complainants gave it more thought before proceeding.
foz is offline  
Closed Thread



Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Domain Sponsor 2


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:18:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 2
All content on Acorn Domains is member generated and is not moderated before posting. All content is viewed and used by you at your own risk and AD does not warrant the accuracy or reliability of any of the information. The views expressed are those of the individual contributors and not necessarily those of AD. Please contact us to report any issues or send a PM to "Admin".