Someone else trademark infringing, what to do?

Frog · 04-11-2010, 09:46:52 PM

I'm not sure if there is any easy solution to this, perhaps I'm better off just ignoring it.

I'm trying to rank for terms like "merchant discount vouchers". For one of the bigger merchants, someone has registered a trademark infringing domain and is ranking for it.

I'm sure I can overtake him in time, but don't feel that I should have to. The site in question is garbage - it simply exists to rank, then passes people via a link to another voucher site. I'm sure this is done to avoid anyone complaining to affiliate networks about the site itself, as it doesn't actually have any affil links on it.

There is no realistic prospect that the merchant allowed this person to buy/use this domain.

The trademark breach is an open and shut case - merchant name in the domain, logo plastered all over it, etc.

If the legal department of the merchant in questions was informed of the existence of this site, would they be forced to act? I'm thinking that if they knew about a trademark infringer but done absolutely nothing about it, they couldn't then do something about it at some later point in time could they?

I mean the merchant might not want to, but if the above is true, I could force them to spend the money/time to remove the trademark infringer who's costing me money...

Any thoughts on what to do, if anything?

thanks

Bailey · 05-11-2010, 12:45:10 AM

In trying to give you a short answer.

1. Attorneys love TM law - it's case by case. Influenced but never dictated.
2. Your right TM holders are obliged to defend their TM's and are therefore obliged to act - in principle.

The sad but realistic truth - is there is always spin (intentional or otherwise) in presenting a 'position' and without the full facts (which courts are great for unearthing) everything else is basically pissing in the wind.

Quote

I mean the merchant might not want to, but if the above is true, I could force them to spend the money/time to remove my trademark infringer...

your use of the wording "the merchant" and "my trademark" is confusing.

Again without all the facts your going nowhere with your questions

Frog · 05-11-2010, 12:55:12 AM

Sorry, I've edited that to be clearer. By "my trademark infringer" I meant to say the person costing me money by infringing someone elses tm.

If number 2) is indeed correct, I guess I might as well type a letter and pay �3 to special delivery it to the suitable legal department...

Though I guess by the time they do, I'll be outranking it anyway. Might as well post the url actually, here it is. Nice ranking on a competitive term too...

Nick · 05-11-2010, 01:00:12 AM

just get some more links & go above them - problem solved

probably quicker than reporting, waiting for drs / removal of site etc

other than that I'm sure affiiliate networks shouldn't be allowing affiliates to get commissions like that so report it to them

Frog · 05-11-2010, 01:08:37 AM

I agree that going above them is the better option since that would mean overtaking another competitor too lol. But I'm not sure how long that would take.

And even then, if you have a domain directly below you that exactly matches the searchers intent, that is going to eat into your traffic so it'd be better off gone from the results if possible.

Affiliate networks won't care as there isn't any affil links on the offending site - the traffic is being passed elsewhere before being monetized.

Bailey · 05-11-2010, 01:22:56 AM

Cheers Frog.
Thats a clearer position - I take it C****D******C**** is your infringer.

I would be taking screenshots of all -I didn't go to the links but there is prima facia in abundance, thats unless this is purely a comment site without PPC. - I didn't doubleclick.

Your client only need send a well worded and recorded letter to see everything disappear. And of course thats not for you to do

Frog · 05-11-2010, 01:29:17 AM

The issue is I don't have a client. I'm merely an injured 3rd party

My own site is discountvouchers.org - I'm losing out on one position in the search results because someone else won't play by the rules. I guess this is going to come off a bit petty, but meh. Just annoying me that someone else is willing to break the rules, and cost me money in the process (even if its a small amount).

Nick · 05-11-2010, 01:33:35 AM

It happens all the time in different forms - e.g. person above is falsely advertising (meta title) expired/invalid voucher code which looks more attractive than your correctly advertised one.

I think your time's better spent on content/promotion of your own site they will get found out sooner rather than later.

Bailey · 05-11-2010, 01:45:45 AM

Wow big new picture emerging - then my advice is don't 'throw stones' or immerse yourself in other peoples principles or problems.

Would I say something to C****, absolutley not, none of my business and trust me they do know.

On the funny side - I never realised "page rank" was that competitive - pretty soon bodies on the streets

Frog · 05-11-2010, 01:47:57 AM

But if someone elses rule breaking affects your earnings, does that not become your business?

04-11-2010, 09:46:52 PM	#1 (permalink)
Frog Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: I have retired from Acorn, rampagejackson321 at gmail if u need me. Posts: 621 No Classified Ratings Domain Trader Rating: (100% / 2)	Someone else trademark infringing, what to do? I'm not sure if there is any easy solution to this, perhaps I'm better off just ignoring it. I'm trying to rank for terms like "merchant discount vouchers". For one of the bigger merchants, someone has registered a trademark infringing domain and is ranking for it. I'm sure I can overtake him in time, but don't feel that I should have to. The site in question is garbage - it simply exists to rank, then passes people via a link to another voucher site. I'm sure this is done to avoid anyone complaining to affiliate networks about the site itself, as it doesn't actually have any affil links on it. There is no realistic prospect that the merchant allowed this person to buy/use this domain. The trademark breach is an open and shut case - merchant name in the domain, logo plastered all over it, etc. If the legal department of the merchant in questions was informed of the existence of this site, would they be forced to act? I'm thinking that if they knew about a trademark infringer but done absolutely nothing about it, they couldn't then do something about it at some later point in time could they? I mean the merchant might not want to, but if the above is true, I could force them to spend the money/time to remove the trademark infringer who's costing me money... Any thoughts on what to do, if anything? thanks Last edited by Frog; 05-11-2010 at 12:52:01 AM.

05-11-2010, 12:45:10 AM	#2 (permalink)
Bailey Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Essex UK Posts: 1,617 No Classified Ratings Domain Trader Rating: (100% / 4)	In trying to give you a short answer. 1. Attorneys love TM law - it's case by case. Influenced but never dictated. 2. Your right TM holders are obliged to defend their TM's and are therefore obliged to act - in principle. The sad but realistic truth - is there is always spin (intentional or otherwise) in presenting a 'position' and without the full facts (which courts are great for unearthing) everything else is basically pissing in the wind. Quote I mean the merchant might not want to, but if the above is true, I could force them to spend the money/time to remove my trademark infringer... your use of the wording "the merchant" and "my trademark" is confusing. Again without all the facts your going nowhere with your questions __________________ TheDon dot Com

05-11-2010, 01:22:56 AM	#6 (permalink)
Bailey Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Essex UK Posts: 1,617 No Classified Ratings Domain Trader Rating: (100% / 4)	Cheers Frog. Thats a clearer position - I take it C**D**C** is your infringer. I would be taking screenshots of all -I didn't go to the links but there is prima facia in abundance, thats unless this is purely a comment site without PPC. - I didn't doubleclick. Your client only need send a well worded and recorded letter to see everything disappear. And of course thats not for you to do __________________ TheDon dot Com Last edited by Bailey; 05-11-2010 at 01:34:01 AM.

05-11-2010, 01:45:45 AM	#9 (permalink)
Bailey Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Essex UK Posts: 1,617 No Classified Ratings Domain Trader Rating: (100% / 4)	Wow big new picture emerging - then my advice is don't 'throw stones' or immerse yourself in other peoples principles or problems. Would I say something to C***, absolutley not, none of my business and trust me they do know. On the funny side - I never realised "page rank" was that competitive - pretty soon bodies on the streets __________________ TheDon dot Com Last edited by Bailey; 05-11-2010 at 01:53:56 AM.*

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

05-11-2010, 12:55:12 AM	#3 (permalink)
Frog Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: I have retired from Acorn, rampagejackson321 at gmail if u need me. Posts: 621 No Classified Ratings Domain Trader Rating: (100% / 2)	Sorry, I've edited that to be clearer. By "my trademark infringer" I meant to say the person costing me money by infringing someone elses tm. If number 2) is indeed correct, I guess I might as well type a letter and pay �3 to special delivery it to the suitable legal department... Though I guess by the time they do, I'll be outranking it anyway. Might as well post the url actually, here it is. Nice ranking on a competitive term too...

05-11-2010, 01:00:12 AM	#4 (permalink)
Nick Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 726 No Classified Ratings Domain Trader Rating: (100% / 27)	just get some more links & go above them - problem solved probably quicker than reporting, waiting for drs / removal of site etc other than that I'm sure affiiliate networks shouldn't be allowing affiliates to get commissions like that so report it to them

05-11-2010, 01:08:37 AM	#5 (permalink)
Frog Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: I have retired from Acorn, rampagejackson321 at gmail if u need me. Posts: 621 No Classified Ratings Domain Trader Rating: (100% / 2)	I agree that going above them is the better option since that would mean overtaking another competitor too lol. But I'm not sure how long that would take. And even then, if you have a domain directly below you that exactly matches the searchers intent, that is going to eat into your traffic so it'd be better off gone from the results if possible. Affiliate networks won't care as there isn't any affil links on the offending site - the traffic is being passed elsewhere before being monetized.

05-11-2010, 01:29:17 AM	#7 (permalink)
Frog Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: I have retired from Acorn, rampagejackson321 at gmail if u need me. Posts: 621 No Classified Ratings Domain Trader Rating: (100% / 2)	The issue is I don't have a client. I'm merely an injured 3rd party My own site is discountvouchers.org - I'm losing out on one position in the search results because someone else won't play by the rules. I guess this is going to come off a bit petty, but meh. Just annoying me that someone else is willing to break the rules, and cost me money in the process (even if its a small amount).

05-11-2010, 01:33:35 AM	#8 (permalink)
Nick Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 726 No Classified Ratings Domain Trader Rating: (100% / 27)	It happens all the time in different forms - e.g. person above is falsely advertising (meta title) expired/invalid voucher code which looks more attractive than your correctly advertised one. I think your time's better spent on content/promotion of your own site they will get found out sooner rather than later.

05-11-2010, 01:47:57 AM	#10 (permalink)
Frog Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: I have retired from Acorn, rampagejackson321 at gmail if u need me. Posts: 621 No Classified Ratings Domain Trader Rating: (100% / 2)	But if someone elses rule breaking affects your earnings, does that not become your business?

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Domain Name Community	Replies	Last Post
Domain name held to be misspelling of Google's trademark - World Trademark Review (su	RSS	Domain Name News	0	04-10-2010 11:59:05 AM
Behind the scenes with Canon's trademark strategy on gTLDs - World Trademark Review (	RSS	Domain Name News	0	01-04-2010 11:59:06 AM
Google initiates trademark bloodbath in the UK	Whois-Search	Domain Name Disputes	3	17-04-2008 12:51:11 PM
Trademark Dispute	GlasgowBob	Domain Name Disputes	4	31-03-2008 09:00:19 PM
Domain regged first then trademark applied for - anyone any similar experience	shaunjock	Domain Name Disputes	13	02-02-2006 03:55:03 PM