whitetoo

Hello domain gurus,

I am seeking advice on a letter that I received today from a law firm acting on behalf of a company which has a very similar domain name to me.

I registered the domain back in 2007, since then a very small site has sat under the domain name, purely for SEO purposes. I haven't had much time to dedicate to the site, therefore the activity is minimum boarding on inactive.

In this letter I received, they state that their client's company is the largest in the UK and has been trading since 2006 and that people hitting my site will be confused with their business and it's a misreputation, and that the company have not given me permission to operate a website that is similarity named to their own.

I want to point out that the website does provide a similar service at a much reduced cost, all the content is mine and the cosmetics and logo are completely different, it's been operating since 2007!

The client has instructed the law firm to take all steps necessary to prevent any continued infringement and will be taken to the High Court if I do not abide by the terms.

1. Don't register any other domains which are similar to their business name.
2. To immediately transfer my domain to their client.
3. To pay all costs to be assessed if not agreed in relation to the infringing activities.

Is this some kind of joke? Surely if this was a High Court case half the internet sites would be wiped out?

I have certainly not set out to deliberately gain business from other sites, the name just happens to be similar and I wasn't aware of the company until this point.

Any comments/feedback or advice as to how to deal with this one would be greatly received. They obviously WANT the domain name, it is of no value to me just a hobby which I registered several years ago but at the same time their bullish attitude has my back up, a legal threat with no prior contact?

Thanks for reading anyway guys, I would truly appreciate any replies.

wb

How similar are the domains? Is it a 'generic' keyword or a 'brandable' made up one? Is it a .uk?

whitetoo

Wow wb thanks for your reply.
The domain is a .co.uk - I guess you could make it brandable but it's not a "made up" bunch of words just purely describes the service provided.

As an example, it's something like:
motortrade
biketrader
moneytrader
credittrade

As an example:
they own "biketrade"
and I own "biketrader"

That's generally where it stands.

GreyWing

Impossible to say with limited info, you are best PM'ing someone like WB on here who will be able to give you a good idea of a likely success rate of defending it.

__________________
Make cash from your website, any website, any sector... That.co.uk Find out more

invincible

[quote=whitetoo;347797]This should be moved to the legal forum.

Do they have any trademarks, filed on dates predating your registration of the domain name, on terms similar to yours? Search via www.ipo.gov.uk

Given you have conceded that the domain name "is of no value" to you, yet the other party obviously want it, you might want to consider how much it is worth holding onto and what £amount you'd let it go for. Unfortunately without knowing the domain name at issue it is never going to be possible to advise you properly.

__________________
Email: invincible.domains@gmail.com (I have disabled private messaging for ease) :)

lomax

Garry Chernoff recently won a UDRP action that attempted to take (read steal) his domain: Autotrade.com

The complainant was the AutoTrader.com Group in the US.

See here for more info:
http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/s...ase=D2011-0923

He was defended by John Berryhill, one of the best domain lawyers out there.

It's not birds, but it's very similar It's also worth noting that AutoTrader have a trademark for same, whereas the people hassling you don't have a registered TM.

Regards

Ashton

Chirp Chirp - Worked it out and couldn't find any tm's for it.

EDIT: The reply above mine is gold and a near perfect example!

peter_w

On the face of it, it doesn't look too good for your domain to be honest.

By the sounds of it, the other company was set up (2006) and was trading before you (2007). From what you have said, your name is basically 1 letter different and you are offering the same service/product. It's unlikely you'd be successful in court, unless you can afford a rather good lawyer.

__________________
You'll find me on LinkedIn, Twitter and Google+.

invincible

I see one of the three panel dissented. Is there any connection between the Complainant and the owners of the equivalent .co.uk?

__________________
Email: invincible.domains@gmail.com (I have disabled private messaging for ease) :)

Edwin

There is a huge difference between a legal challenge being "a joke" and being "unlikely to succeed on merit". Any time that a lawfirm takes the trouble to throw the book at you, it's worth at least treating their concerns seriously, even if you personally believe they will ultimately fail in their challenge.

After all, by offering no defense or response of any kind, you are dramatically lengthening the odds against keeping the domain name.

You need to take a step back and figure out how much you want to keep the domain name. If it's "enough to pay for a lawyer" then Paul Keating just joined the forum and would probably be a great asset in defending your side of the issue.

If it's not worth bringing in legal representation, then you've got a few more choices:
A) Agree to the demands in full
B) Hand the domain over but disregard the additional terms
C) Argue specific points of their challenge as best you can
D) Do nothing
E) Tell them to... (no, I won't go there - just not my style)

__________________
Memorable Domains Ltd - Over 7,000 descriptive, generic .co.uk domains for sale
Please note: All sale prices over a week old are automatically invalid. No exceptions. Thanks!