Buy Sell Discuss UK Domain Names at AcornDomains.co.uk NameDrive

Today's drop dates are 15-08-2008 & 22-08-2008  
Domain Name Sales Domain Software Calculate UK Domain Drop Dates Domain Lists SedoPro Code Domains For Sale NameDrive Domain Parking
Go Back   Domain Name Forum Acorn Domains Buy Sell Trade UK Domain Names > Domain Name Research > Domain Research

Domain Research Discuss domain research questions, what makes a domain worth the Reg Fee?

View Poll Results: Typos
Hate em' 5 27.78%
Reg them if a really good domain 7 38.89%
wwwtypo lover 3 16.67%
bring em on I love spending money... 3 16.67%
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19-06-2006, 08:12 PM   #11

 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 1,086
tifosi has a reputation beyond reputetifosi has a reputation beyond reputetifosi has a reputation beyond reputetifosi has a reputation beyond reputetifosi has a reputation beyond reputetifosi has a reputation beyond reputetifosi has a reputation beyond reputetifosi has a reputation beyond reputetifosi has a reputation beyond reputetifosi has a reputation beyond reputetifosi has a reputation beyond repute

Quote:
Originally Posted by olebean
Can we add a category "am i bovered!"
won't let me
tifosi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-06-2006, 08:14 PM   #12

 
texidriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Beckofbeyond
Posts: 504
texidriver has a reputation beyond reputetexidriver has a reputation beyond reputetexidriver has a reputation beyond reputetexidriver has a reputation beyond reputetexidriver has a reputation beyond reputetexidriver has a reputation beyond reputetexidriver has a reputation beyond reputetexidriver has a reputation beyond reputetexidriver has a reputation beyond reputetexidriver has a reputation beyond reputetexidriver has a reputation beyond repute

[quote=grandin]....... cause TM would not be issued on a name that is solely descriptive of the classification of trade.

Get your head round this then.

"Football"

Class 41:
Providing sports facilities and recreation facilities; sports and recreation
advisory and information services; organising sports events; rental of stadium
facilities and sports equipment; organisation of competitions; sports club
services; physical education; games services provided on-line from a computer network.

http://webdb4.patent.gov.uk/tm/numbe...demark=2374590
texidriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-06-2006, 05:42 AM   #13

 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,000
grandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond repute

not easy

nigel you wrote 'I would agree with your good examples and reasoning - I assume Nominet experts in a DRS would take a similar line but I don't whether it has been put to the test.'

My problem with the drs, wipo and eurid is that they are not prepared to make clear cut rules and stand by them....they have a clause that empowers the expert 'to do as he likes'....if the rules were clear cut at least we would know where we stand and then we could then direct our energy to the rules that we thought were unfair.

With non clear cut rules we are to use common sense to interpret the rules BUT as EURID have said to me common sense has no place....so round and round we go....I wouldn't mind so much BUT the remedy for an expert is TRANSFER to the complainant which is turly unfair given so much uncertainty.......it is easy to make mistakes when its all but clear.....

Lee
grandin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-06-2006, 05:48 AM   #14

 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,000
grandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond repute

football.eu

texi wrote :
Get your head round this then.

"Football"

Class 41:
Providing sports facilities and recreation facilities; sports and recreation
advisory and information services; organising sports events; rental of stadium
facilities and sports equipment; organisation of competitions; sports club
services; physical education; games services provided on-line from a computer network.

http://webdb4.patent.gov.uk/tm/numbe...demark=2374590

Thats a good one texi....the patents reasoning is that class 41 has no relation to football but clearly the description does. Did the owner of the TM apply for a .eu domain name under sunrise...cause if they were first they would have got it!!

I might start applying for some trade marks on my generic words....is bul.co.uk a generic word or it just descriptive of trade mark law?

Lee
grandin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-06-2006, 10:09 AM   #15

 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 384
Nigel has a reputation beyond reputeNigel has a reputation beyond reputeNigel has a reputation beyond reputeNigel has a reputation beyond reputeNigel has a reputation beyond reputeNigel has a reputation beyond reputeNigel has a reputation beyond reputeNigel has a reputation beyond reputeNigel has a reputation beyond reputeNigel has a reputation beyond reputeNigel has a reputation beyond repute

Quote:
Originally Posted by grandin

My problem with the drs, wipo and eurid is that they are not prepared to make clear cut rules and stand by them....they have a clause that empowers the expert 'to do as he likes'....if the rules were clear cut at least we would know where we stand and then we could then direct our energy to the rules that we thought were unfair.

With non clear cut rules we are to use common sense to interpret the rules BUT as EURID have said to me common sense has no place....so round and round we go....I wouldn't mind so much BUT the remedy for an expert is TRANSFER to the complainant which is turly unfair given so much uncertainty.......it is easy to make mistakes when its all but clear.....

Lee
I agree and this is another reason why the DRS fee should be a lot higher than NIL to initiate a DRS and just £750 to take to the Expert stage.
Nigel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-06-2006, 11:37 AM   #16

 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,000
grandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond reputegrandin has a reputation beyond repute

subjective abusive intent

The DRS (as I see it) was designed to speed the process of Trade Mark holders getting hold of their relevant domain names prior to an infringement occurring. This has led to so many DRS cases that the DRS is too complex for any layman to understand....if common sense was to prevail then I do not think that any DRS would have a problem but the fact that common sense is not prevailing then the contract (the contract includes the DRS) is an unfair contract. The contract requires the registrant to be as good as a Trade Mark Attorney in interpretting the law....buying a domain is more complicated than buying a house and that transaction requires legal representation.

I must say....Nominet have got it easy in comparison to EURID...I don't understand my contract with EURID...the best they can do is refer back to the European Commission to re write the rules

Lee

Last edited by grandin; 20-06-2006 at 11:43 AM.
grandin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Domain Name Community Replies Last Post
Wanted.. traffic typos.. fastworld Domain Name Wanted 0 13-06-2006 06:16 PM
1 x top boy band & 1 x top girl band - www (no dot) typos - and more! wwwdomain.name Top Level Domain Names For Sale 1 03-05-2006 04:22 PM
The Web's Million-Dollar Typos - Washington Post RSS Domain Name News 0 29-04-2006 08:59 PM
Mikrosoft discovers malicious profiting from typos aqls Domain Name News 8 25-01-2006 01:32 PM
What are the most common typos? accelerator Domain Appraisals, Website Reviews 3 27-07-2005 06:05 PM

Namedrive


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85