Markup Validation Service

mat · 27-02-2009, 04:49:08 PM

[Invalid] Markup Validation of http://www.w3.org/ - W3C Markup Validator

rjs_essex · 27-02-2009, 06:13:16 PM

lol

Shocking!

rjs_essex · 27-02-2009, 06:14:19 PM

Even this is pretty bad considering the cash flow - Link

Rich

DaveH · 28-02-2009, 04:49:28 PM

Fixed now

bensd · 28-02-2009, 06:22:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rjs_essex

Even this is pretty bad considering the cash flow - Link

Rich

A lot of big sites aren't valid:

ebay - 195 errors
amazon - 1310 errors 139 warnings
sky sports - 211 errors 47 warnings
yahoo - 153 errors 21 warnings

And these are websites that have massive web development teams in the company

retired_member16 · 28-02-2009, 08:21:35 PM

Or you could read that it doesnt matter a jot that its complient or not?

Systreg · 28-02-2009, 08:32:39 PM

I don't know anything about w3 compliance stuff, my anti fraud site seems to have a few errors

:

Quote:

Result: 60 Errors, 218 warning(s)

deliajen · 01-03-2009, 04:58:01 PM

i wouldn't worry about it,it seems every time you add content it makes a site non-complient,i run most my sites through w3c before i add content and then when i add my bumph it knocks it out again...

rjs_essex · 01-03-2009, 06:28:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deliajen

i wouldn't worry about it,it seems every time you add content it makes a site non-complient,i run most my sites through w3c before i add content and then when i add my bumph it knocks it out again...

Providing your css is solid you shouldn't have any problems unless you start using wysiwyg editors and adding tables etc...

27-02-2009, 04:49:08 PM	#1 (permalink)
mat Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Hampshire Posts: 3,311 No Classified Ratings Domain Trader Rating: (100% / 39)	Markup Validation Service [Invalid] Markup Validation of http://www.w3.org/ - W3C Markup Validator __________________ Mathew.co.uk - Follow me on Twitter here

27-02-2009, 06:14:19 PM	#3 (permalink)
rjs_essex Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Essex Posts: 2,176 No Classified Ratings Domain Trader Rating: (100% / 26)	Even this is pretty bad considering the cash flow - Link Rich __________________ Richard - Read my blog: File under: 'Miscellaneous'... Twitter - Follow me: Find out what I'm doing! Phone Insurance \| Pool Balls \| Pool Cues

01-03-2009, 04:58:01 PM	#8 (permalink)
deliajen Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: loughborough,leicestershire Posts: 1,818 No Classified Ratings Domain Trader Rating: (94% / 14)	i wouldn't worry about it,it seems every time you add content it makes a site non-complient,i run most my sites through w3c before i add content and then when i add my bumph it knocks it out again... __________________ PizzaVouchers \| Pendant\| Loughborough

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Domain Name Community	Replies	Last Post
DomainAssets.ca New Service a First for Growing .CA Domain Aftermarket - Wire Service	RSS	Domain Name News	0	13-07-2008 10:59:19 PM
Canada's Only Canadian Domain Name Appraisal Service - Wire Service Canada (press rel	RSS	Domain Name News	0	20-02-2008 09:59:06 PM

27-02-2009, 06:13:16 PM	#2 (permalink)
rjs_essex Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Essex Posts: 2,176 No Classified Ratings Domain Trader Rating: (100% / 26)	lol Shocking!

28-02-2009, 04:49:28 PM	#4 (permalink)
DaveH Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Southern England Posts: 591 No Classified Ratings Domain Trader Rating: (100% / 24)	Fixed now

28-02-2009, 08:21:35 PM	#6 (permalink)
retired_member16 Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 3,730 No Classified Ratings Domain Trader Rating: (100% / 39)	Or you could read that it doesnt matter a jot that its complient or not?