Bin Laden: Shoot To Kill

[Sean]

Originally Posted by BREWSTERS

Well, when you see the planes hit the towers - that fireball - that's 10,000 gallons of aviation fuel going up in smoke. FACT.

Okay, let's debunk them one at a time. Point us to your source of this fact.

[pred]

Originally Posted by Sean

Okay, let's debunk them one at a time. Point us to your source of this fact.

heres a good place to start for anyone that has done no research in modern history for years (not saying you)
but it's a good place to start purely on 9/11
watch with an open mind, then let your own research take you wherever it takes you
to prove points, to try to debunk is all healthy

enjoy

you know what youtube is like you will be stuck on there hours
some trash, some gold

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7E3oIbO0AWE

so much is happening all the time though
new info, etc.

[BREWSTERS]

Originally Posted by Sean

Okay, let's debunk them one at a time. Point us to your source of this fact.

The 'source' is common sense. A plane full of fuel hits an object which itself is largely benign from an instantly flammable point of view. A huge fireball is immediately released. Now, what would you say was the source of that fireball?


Why is it that people need to be told everything - why does there have to be an outside source? You guys are all intelligent but why switch off your brains and look for an outside source to give you your opinion? All it takes is some lateral thinking.

[Sean]

Originally Posted by BREWSTERS

The 'source' is common sense. A plane full of fuel hits an object which itself is largely benign from an instantly flammable point of view. A huge fireball is immediately released. Now, what would you say was the source of that fireball?

I asked for facts, not theory. Here's a fact

"Brian Reeves, a 34-year-old security guard, was nearly killed while making the rounds in the lobby of 1 World Trade Center on September 11. He started to run after hearing an explosion that he said sounded like a missile, but he was knocked down by a fireball that roared down the elevator shaft.

Reeves suffered third-degree burns to 40 percent of his body before he was able to pat out the flames. He was one of 20 critically-injured patients rushed to New York Presbyterian’s burn unit that day.

He has recovered from the physical injuries, but the nightmares and flashbacks still haunt him. Vowing to be a survivor and not a victim, Reeves recently returned to the World Trade Center site for the first time since September 11 to face down his fears."

[grantw]

Originally Posted by BREWSTERS

Now, what would you say was the source of that fireball?

Probaby the fuel, but it's not a fact is it??? Unless you're some sort of aviation crash expert and witnessed it first hand I don't see how you can claim to 'know' that this is correct.

Were you there?

Grant

[cm1975]

Originally Posted by BREWSTERS

The 'source' is common sense. A plane full of fuel hits an object which itself is largely benign from an instantly flammable point of view. A huge fireball is immediately released. Now, what would you say was the source of that fireball?

I'm going to take an educated guess at this. Some of the fuel will have burned immediately, but due to the enclosed nature of the WTC, not all the fuel would have been able to burn due to a lack of oxygen and exposure to the flames.

I'm sure we've all seen images of a petrol bomb exploding in the news or in films. The petrol within the bottle does not immediately all burn and a pool of petrol can burn for a few minutes afterwards. I imagine the same principles apply, except the pool of fuel/flames would have descended within the building.

[Sean]

Grant, the fireball was fuel, the thing is that Brewster argues that the whole 10,000 gallons went up at the point of impact and that there was no fire in the elevators or core of the building!

It beats me that people will happily debunk a newspaper report but will point to a YouTube video!!

[mat]

So in other words Brewsters your facts are also coming from the media, whether its the TV, Internet, YouTube, Documentaries, Books...

Where did you hear about these witnesses? History channel ?? Or do you have real life accounts from these people?

I'm not going to argue anymore, it's a waste of my time. It is laughable though that the places you get your "facts" from is the exact same place we are supposedly being fed lies through.

If you were heavily involved in the investigation or were part of the team that constructed the world trace centres I would listen to you, but you’re not.

As it happens I keep a very open mind on everything. I’m sure the Americans used the attacks as a great reason to finally sort out the Middle East and get their oil secured. I just think your baloney takes things too far.

[Sean]

Have a read of these eye witness accounts, assuming you don't think that they were all in on the conspiracy

https://sites.google.com/site/911sto...saccounts,lobb

[pred]

Originally Posted by Sean

I asked for facts, not theory. Here's a fact

"Brian Reeves, a 34-year-old security guard, was nearly killed while making the rounds in the lobby of 1 World Trade Center on September 11. He started to run after hearing an explosion that he said sounded like a missile, but he was knocked down by a fireball that roared down the elevator shaft.

Reeves suffered third-degree burns to 40 percent of his body before he was able to pat out the flames. He was one of 20 critically-injured patients rushed to New York Presbyterian’s burn unit that day.

He has recovered from the physical injuries, but the nightmares and flashbacks still haunt him. Vowing to be a survivor and not a victim, Reeves recently returned to the World Trade Center site for the first time since September 11 to face down his fears."

dont want to be insulting Sean but you got a few years of research lol if you're coming out with quotes like this
you're at the very start
what you been doing for 10 years lol?

check out william rodriguez
the head janitor of wtc
who had the master keys and rescued some of the burns victims you're talking about
last man out, worked there 20 years
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DIC0K...eature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIZtq...eature=related


theres whole organisations beeen formed of structural and civil engineers who are categorically saying the towers were brought down
getting almost zero exposure from mainstream
the actual firefighters who were there. THE heroes of the day, the ones that survived are saying what we're saying. the chief fire officer who was there slates guiliani , calls him a coward who ran away

look for the actual videos of these people
the people who know the most and have the most to be angry about are perhaps the firefighters

this is a big step
for people that have been walking around wioth their head in the clouds being fed horse manure from mainstream media, you have a lot of growing up to fo
basically if you do your research about whats really going on in the world and has done in the past few decades you will probably start doubting all the misconceived crap you have believed for years without questioning

anyway. i havent got all day
watch the videos
research sites, hundreds of them. look at all sides
and just on the 911 angle. i say just. there is only one main conclusion to reach

and it's horrifying