Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.

9/11 Charlie Sheen / your views

Discussion in 'General Board' started by domainseller200, Sep 13, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. domainseller200 United Kingdom

    domainseller200 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2007
    Posts:
    3,279
    Likes Received:
    138
    So lots of you will have heard this on the news, but what are your own thoughts ?

    YouTube - Charlie Sheen's Video Message to President Obama

    Obviously Mr Sheen has waited until a new president has come into power, as he SHOULD be able to give a totally independant view (in theory)

    I have always thought there has been a conspiracy to some degree, and after watching the video and seeing lots of other things over the years, I am now even more convinced.

    My own conclusion is that the 9/11 attack DID have something to do with the US government, and was planned as a reason / justification to go to war with Iraq over the oil etc etc.

    Obviously this is my view and could be rubbish, but I would be interested to hear others thoughts / beliefs etc.

    Nice little sunday debate :)
     
  2. Domain Forum

    Acorn Domains Elite Member

    Joined:
    1999
    Messages:
    Many
    Likes Received:
    Lots
    IWA Meetup
     
  3. GreyWing

    GreyWing Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2006
    Posts:
    4,033
    Likes Received:
    56
    Charlie sheen off his rocker imo. Anyone that thinks you could keep a secret like this in Government obviously has not worked for any Government or military around the world.

    To wire those buildings with explosives and the number of people and time to do it would have been huge.

    What happened is that intelligence got word of it going to happen but disregarded it and now covered that mistake up. But people have to put that into context of hundreds of plots coming to their attention per week.

    So whilst there maybe a cover up, it's a cover up of mistakes rather than government plot.
     
  4. Darren

    Darren Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2008
    Posts:
    2,248
    Likes Received:
    31
    Last edited: Sep 13, 2009
  5. domainseller200 United Kingdom

    domainseller200 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2007
    Posts:
    3,279
    Likes Received:
    138
    Mistakes such as ?
     
  6. domainseller200 United Kingdom

    domainseller200 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2007
    Posts:
    3,279
    Likes Received:
    138
  7. GreyWing

    GreyWing Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2006
    Posts:
    4,033
    Likes Received:
    56
    They pick up intelligence and get tip offs from people all around the world. They may have picked someone up or someone might have been an paid informant and told the FBI / CIA what was going to happen.

    This then gets writtend down and field up the chain. Someone up the chain reads hundreds of these plost and didn't take it seriously, it happens a lot and 9999 out of 10,000 it is the right decision. Obviously with hindsight this one would have been wrong to disreguard it.

    So if the media found out then all hell would have broken loose, that is why they probably covered it up.

    That is absolute worse case scenario on any cover up, nothing worse than that.
     
  8. Darren

    Darren Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2008
    Posts:
    2,248
    Likes Received:
    31
  9. retired_member32

    retired_member32 Retired Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2007
    Posts:
    2,124
    Likes Received:
    21
    there are questions that need to be asked?

    why was an insurance policy in excess of £3bn taken out two weeks before the buildings were hit,even though there were sufficient cover for 4 months.

    why did they attack iraq ? the bombers were from saudi arabia
     
  10. domainseller200 United Kingdom

    domainseller200 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2007
    Posts:
    3,279
    Likes Received:
    138
    Because the US government were behind it all, and it was all planned and a cover up to justify war on Iraq.

    The pentagon is the most guarded and CCTV covered building in the world, and yet they refused to release any footage about the plane actually hitting the pentagon - why ?

    How can the buildings just fall to the ground just like they did, with no explosives ? lots of people said they heard explosives going off ?

    These are just a couple for starters !
     
  11. SF

    SF Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2005
    Posts:
    7,543
    Likes Received:
    58
    Frank wtf are you on drugs or what mate.. charlie sheen has lost the plot mate..
     
  12. retired_member12

    retired_member12 Retired Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2006
    Posts:
    1,498
    Likes Received:
    22
    Which is what happened 3 years earlier in the American Embassy attack in Nairobi. A walk-in reported an imminent truck bomb attack on the embassy, but those further up the chain dismissed it, owing to the low standing of the informant.

    It's no surprise therefore that some 3 years later, they would want to cover up failed intelligence analysis again.
     
  13. domainseller200 United Kingdom

    domainseller200 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2007
    Posts:
    3,279
    Likes Received:
    138
    Wish I was :p

    Have you actually watched the video Sean ? he has just voiced what 10's of millions of people have thought for years
     
  14. GreyWing

    GreyWing Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2006
    Posts:
    4,033
    Likes Received:
    56
    and July 7th bombings over here, unfortunately the security services can only track x amount of people at a time.
     
  15. domainseller200 United Kingdom

    domainseller200 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2007
    Posts:
    3,279
    Likes Received:
    138
    That was the UK Governments answer (their own 9/11) to justify their involvment with the war on Iraq :)
     
  16. GreyWing

    GreyWing Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2006
    Posts:
    4,033
    Likes Received:
    56
    Who is "they" break it down to x individuals. I know people who serve in some of the most secret units and to even suggest people like that would get involved in stuff like this is crazy. They would tell their superiors to pee off if it ever got suggested they did this stuff. Remember that they have families as well.

    Maybe they just don't have any more on that area of the building and it would be embarrasing to admit it.

    How did those buildings stand for so long.

    Yep I remember the extra questions, all the jews being off work that day, Mossad agents on the plane.

    The engines from the hijacked flight 93 ending up 7 miles from the crash scene. Then it turned out that people were measuring the distance from the plane to the engines by a mapping system on the net that followed the road which went round a river which was 7 miles, yet only 300 meters as the crow flies.

    Anyone that knows government and miltary knows that nothing goes to plan and to organise this just wasn't possible.
     
  17. domainseller200 United Kingdom

    domainseller200 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2007
    Posts:
    3,279
    Likes Received:
    138
    Obviously I cannot break it down to x individuals, as I do not know this. To suggest "they have families as well" is a weak argument in the respect of a reason not to do it - Royal Marines have familes also - doesn't stop the killing someone with their bare hands if the need is called for.


    So they would rather falsify a whole story of a plane crashing into it, than admit there were no cameras in that part ?

    The way the buildings collapsed was very similar to the way buildings collapsed in a controlled demolition of a building. A building of that strength and size would not have collapsed in that way, without the aid of already planted explosives in the building.

    Yes but thats the whole point - it didn't go to plan - there are lots of flaws in the whole scenario. If they are not involved, then alot of these flaws are easily cleared up by releasing footage and answering questions that people so desperatly want answers to, which wouldn't be a problem if they were not involved.
     
  18. Darren

    Darren Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2008
    Posts:
    2,248
    Likes Received:
    31
  19. domainseller200 United Kingdom

    domainseller200 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2007
    Posts:
    3,279
    Likes Received:
    138
    Also, A few days after the attack, several newspapers as well as the FBI reported that a paper passport had been found in the ruins of the WTC. In August 2004, CNN reported that 9/11 hijacker Ziad Jarrah’s visa was found in the remains of Flight 93 which went down in Shanksville, Pennsylvania

    At least a third of the WTC victim’s bodies were vaporized and many of the victims of the Pentagon incident were burned beyond recognition. And yet visas and paper passports which identify the perpetrators and back up the official version of events miraculously survive explosions and fires that we are told melted steel buildings.
     
  20. GreyWing

    GreyWing Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2006
    Posts:
    4,033
    Likes Received:
    56
    Nope it's not a weak argument mate, do you think I would go out and fly a plane into a building or organise the demolition on a building because someone told me too?

    Killing people ion the heat of battle is different, what you are talking about is murder.

    British soldier resigns in protest at 'illegal' Iraq war

    These are the types of people who fill the military top end, not the Rambo's.

    Falsify?

    Where did the plane go and all the people on it then? 100 people just dissapeared?

    The floors collapsed onto each other, each one collapsing onto the next causing a multiplication of force as they dropped. If they had dropped in silence then I would be suspicious.

    have you heard of one, just one person from any government agency who said they involved in any conspiracy? and planted explosives or whatever.

    Nope, this government can't even stop a leaked report on the baby p incident from hitting the news, the stockwell shooting from coming out early. That is how government is conducted in reality not this idea you have where even keeps quiet and nothing ever leaks out.

    Mate I'll probably leave it there on this, if people want to involve themselves in these fantasies then so be it. But believe to anyone that has worked in forces or government, you are giving them too much credit on their ability to organise anything more than a piss up in a brewery.
     
  21. domainseller200 United Kingdom

    domainseller200 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2007
    Posts:
    3,279
    Likes Received:
    138
    No probs, if you are leaving it there, there is no point in me answering your questions with more facts. I can see the facts in what you say in more ways than one - but it will not stop me or millions of others believing that there is a cover up in one way or another :)

    Nice to have a sunday debate mate :)

    Next sunday - What REALLY happened to the Titanic ? YouTube - Unfastened Coins: Titanic Conspiracy (All meant in harmless fun :) and worth 2 minutes of your time to lighten up the mood)
     
    Last edited: Sep 13, 2009
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.