Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.

privalige.co.uk & mercer.co.uk appeals

Discussion in 'Domain Name Disputes' started by Whois-Search, Oct 11, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Whois-Search

    Whois-Search Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2004
    Posts:
    1,967
    Likes Received:
    149
  2. Domain Forum

    Acorn Domains Elite Member

    Joined:
    1999
    Messages:
    Many
    Likes Received:
    Lots
    IWA Meetup
     
  3. grandin United Kingdom

    grandin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 2006
    Posts:
    1,304
    Likes Received:
    10
    Ha

    Oh yes Nominet...

    Nominet states on this case 'Nominet recognises that experts may on occasion make mistakes'

    My comment in respect to generic domain names 'Nominet doesn't recognise (through the policy) that registrants may on occassion make mistakes when using their domain names'

    When experts make mistakes we should transfer their expert title to another....keep it fair

    Lee
     
  4. invincible

    invincible Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2005
    Posts:
    4,203
    Likes Received:
    101
    Why would it be "surprise surprise" because of another "No Action"? I'd have expected the former "No Action" decision to have been "Overturned: Transferred" rather than "Overturned: No Action", since I took your "surprise surprise" to be sarcastic (which I think it was). Anyway the decision was actually "Overturned: Transferred" so it's a mistake on the Nominet web site.

    I cannot wait to see the outcome of that one.

    More than what? ;) :mrgreen:
     
  5. sneezycheese

    sneezycheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2005
    Posts:
    549
    Likes Received:
    15
    ...Therefore I ask - Can the Nominet Contract be voidable under the Doctrine of Mistake??? :???:

    Regards,

    Sneezy.
     
  6. Creature United Kingdom

    Creature Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2006
    Posts:
    199
    Likes Received:
    4
    Agreed. Apply the rule to everyone.
     
  7. grandin United Kingdom

    grandin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 2006
    Posts:
    1,304
    Likes Received:
    10
    story time

    I will tell you a little story soon...trading standards

    \lee
     
  8. ELIFE-MZ

    ELIFE-MZ Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2005
    Posts:
    633
    Likes Received:
    60
    Looks like mercer decision has been overturned. Well done Chris.

    Appeals
     
  9. invincible

    invincible Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2005
    Posts:
    4,203
    Likes Received:
    101
    Noticed that earlier. Hope he felt it was worth the £3000. :)
     
  10. retired_member6

    retired_member6 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 2005
    Posts:
    5,598
    Likes Received:
    29
    Well they can sue them now and get the £3k back.
     
  11. invincible

    invincible Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2005
    Posts:
    4,203
    Likes Received:
    101
    Somehow, I doubt it. Mind if I rattle off one of my old favourites which is "cost of doing business"? :mrgreen: :p
     
  12. sneezycheese

    sneezycheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2005
    Posts:
    549
    Likes Received:
    15
    It's interesting to note that looking at the overall appeal results that 53% of 'expert' decisions that have gone to appeal have been overturned - so not a good picture. :rolleyes:

    More interesting is that for this year alone the percentage of 'expert' decisions that have gone to appeal and have been overtured is a WOPPING 83% - !!! :eek:

    Surly Nominet 'must' be getting the message now! :???:

    Roll on the new year! :mrgreen:

    Regards,

    Sneezy.
     
  13. Jay Daley New Zealand

    Jay Daley Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2005
    Posts:
    349
    Likes Received:
    12
    No, don't worry Lee, we're okay. Really. No need. Honestly.
     
  14. retired_member6

    retired_member6 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 2005
    Posts:
    5,598
    Likes Received:
    29
    Well I'm sure they can claim the £3k back somehow, that's how courts work right? if you have to defend yourself you can claim costs back after winning, I 'kin would after spending £3k, they're clearly wrong it's been judged now it's get your money back time.

    I know you're rich enough to put everything in costs of business but others can be made to go to the wall (not Millwall - fortunately for them) over decisions by these arses. Where's the deterrant if the defendent doesn't go after monies from the complainant? So yes you all sit back spend your £3ks like it's going out of fashion and let complainants think it's that easy.
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2006
  15. sneezycheese

    sneezycheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2005
    Posts:
    549
    Likes Received:
    15
    ...of course you are Jay - lets not worry about a thing - why don't you cosy up in your little blanket of... ??? - Ah bless. :rolleyes:
     
  16. rob

    rob Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2005
    Posts:
    5,966
    Likes Received:
    119
    blankets? Hes in sao paulo currently... bang "sao paulo women" into google image search.

    I know which I would be cosying up to :)
     
  17. sneezycheese

    sneezycheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2005
    Posts:
    549
    Likes Received:
    15
    ...mmm - me too! ;) :mrgreen:
     
  18. weycresto

    weycresto Active Member

    Joined:
    May 2006
    Posts:
    104
    Likes Received:
    2
    Sorry I've been asleep. Whats this? They have decided to spend Nominets cash on sao paulo women now? Maybe thats really where the "mizz" tags really hang out! :rolleyes:
     
  19. rob

    rob Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2005
    Posts:
    5,966
    Likes Received:
    119
    ICANN São Paulo :: :)
     
  20. weycresto

    weycresto Active Member

    Joined:
    May 2006
    Posts:
    104
    Likes Received:
    2
    Very nice - I 'll make do with Canning Town thankyou.
     
  21. grandin United Kingdom

    grandin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 2006
    Posts:
    1,304
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trading Standards

    Jay, why are you replying to a post of many days ago?

    Are you implying that you have just been given the all clear from Trading Standards i.e. that you are ok to sell the current contract to your consumers?

    Lee
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.