![]() |
|
| Domain Name Sales | Domain Software | Calculate UK Domain Drop Dates | Domain Registration | NameDrive | Domain Parking |
| | ||||||
| Search Engine Optimisation Discuss Search Engine Optimisation |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Member | Is your site overly SEO'd?
There are more moves ahead at Google to get the 'best' content to the top of the organic rankings, rather than just well SEOd sites. This looks like it could be a real game-changer for many SEO guys out there? But who knows? http://www.seroundtable.com/google-o...ate-14887.html As mentioned in the previous thread re. Google and forthcoming changes, I guess it's all about making them more advertising £s |
| |
| | #2 (permalink) |
![]() |
That's been the thorn in independent or small businesses paw as of late How do Google define 'best' - again it's by popularity, linkbacks, who's trending/talking about you, where are you active on social media, what reputable businesses are talking about you etc.... They can't automatically define 'content' on it's own merit. If it was, we'd all stand a better chance! To get there you either need a lot of luck, large pockets (for advertising to become known) or already heavily established. Meaning big businesses get to the top of the engines rather than being a level playing field. |
| |
| | #3 (permalink) |
![]() |
I think it's a hint that they are focusing on spun and duplicate content. There are too many autoblogs with spun content that make ridiculous amounts of money.
__________________ Jenni | Blossom | Video Tutorials @blossomnu (tell me you're from Acorn & I'll add you back!) |
| |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Member |
who knows? I think that as long as you keep it all relevant, informational, unique (on page and from quality incoming links) you should have half a chance of keeping or improving your ranking positions. Do you think this new change could increase the value of well aged exact match domains even more? |
| |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Member |
I was thinking about the ability to be able to continue to push quality links using exact match (or similar and relevant) anchor text to an exact match domain without potentially being penalised for it, thus increasing the potential value of the exact match domain. I found this article really interesting too. http://www.seobythesea.com/2011/10/g...rcial-queries/ |
| |
| | #8 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: County Cork Republic of Ireland
Posts: 5,403
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Domain Trader Rating: (100% / 112) |
Oh no, what are all the seo spammers sending their spam emails going to do now |
| |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Member |
The bottom line is, Google wants everything to be natural, so make it look natural. Over optimising a keyword is like waving the white flag at them.
|
| |
| | #10 (permalink) |
![]() |
From what ive read, we're talking too many backlinks with same anchor text... Thing is, EMD can't avoid the EMD term as anchor as it's the name of the site?! Surely if there was one phrase you would be given benefit of the doubt, it's this one?
|
| |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |