Discussion in 'General Board' started by BREWSTERS, Feb 23, 2011.
So when is the 35-year-old suspect being released for "good behaviour"
Probably saved the country about £5million too!
Was laughing at this morning, ashame they don't all get that, I hope for a while Seans parents have a gleaming smile on their faces
We are not America. We don't have a death penalty in our country. It's hard to understand how you guys can perceive the disgraceful lapse in security that led to one thug murdering another thug as somehow a good thing.
It is rare that I agree with you, Philip, but I do agree with your sentiment.
OTOH the outcome of the enquiry into such cases is usually the determinand of what happened.
If someone, prisoner or officer, is found to be at fault, it is a "disgraceful lapse in security".
If no individual blame is attributed, a jury of his peers has found that the continued existence of the victim is an offence against society. It's a jungle in there ...
We do not allow prisoners the right to vote, let alone the right to decide whether another prisoner lives or dies. That is why this incident is an utter disgrace.
Regardless, it is distasteful to see the incident viewed as some kind of triumph of natural justice - when in fact the prison itself has failed to perform its legal purpose.
Call me old fashioned, call me from last century... I don't mind... Honest...
And I am not going to be over humane either.
Child killers should be hanged. Full stop!
The law does not allow prisoners the right to vote. Nonetheless, they have opinions, and they have moral values. Because of the nature of his crimes, the victim in this case is a "classified nonce".
Perhaps if the other prisoners had the right to decide who they shared their environment with, his existence would be continuing in Broadmoor or Rampton - as recommended earlier in the documented evidence.
Say what you like, I don't think he's going to be missed. Like the few bob Doodle is placing on the roulette wheel as I write ...
I don't think he'll be missed. Certainly, I don't miss him. But that is not the point and I personally find the elation expressed here to be in poor taste.
I say R.I.P Colin Hatch
Rest In Peices as the maggots munch on you scum
Ah yes, a typical doodlebug response. I do realise that it's a bad idea to get involved in these tasteless threads, it's just that I can't bear to see the stupidity go entirely unchallenged.
From reading the article, what I find most depressing is that he was allowed out on bail to commit more crimes. The nature of his crimes should've triggered warning signs early on. Imagine losing a child in such a way, and then being told that the guy had a history of commiting such abuses.
There's a notorious paederast, quite rich - he is a builder - who is famously known as a dirty old man, but has never been sufficiently stupid to get caught. Chase him and his known associates and you could cleanse Europe of a lot of perverts. But it is all down to priorities ...
Shame they didn't cut his balls off first. Summary justice in rare instances like this is, IMO, justified. Hopefully it will make other scum like this think twice before they abuse their next victim.
I am 100% certain, that if filth like this were in the general population in prisons instead of being protected through segregation, that a lot of them would be able to control themselves and not commit the evil crimes in the first place.
If this guy had lived for another 50 years in prison it would cost the state at least £5m - when we have pensioners and WW2 veterans frightened to put the heating on in winter, there is something wrong with our priorities.
Well said Brewsters
If these people knew they would get their head kicked in on a daily basis they would keep thier hands to theirselves.
And Phillip you're right, a typical Doodlebug response because typically I think anyone like Colin Hatch should put to death.
Humans have been around for approx 200,000 years , it's only the last 200 years or so that you havn't been allowed to kill someone in order to protect your family.
So who's right ? the people of 200 years or the people of 200,000 years ?
It's nature to protect your loved ones or seek revenge for someone harming them so the fact that someone else did it for them is good
Untrue. U.S. jails have a terrible record of violence, but nevertheless they keep fillling.
Perhaps they should be. But that is a matter of law, and we do not have the death penalty in this country. Therefore it cannot be considered a victory when our rubbish prisons allow one thug to murder another thug while in supposedly secure custody.
If I'm to be honest Phillip that did come to mind but I don't know how many child sex offenders get attacked in their system but yes you're right their prisons are violent and there are still child sex offenders.
Separate names with a comma.