Discussion in 'General Board' started by disruptive, May 25, 2011.
I think their TM should be challenged - it's akin to getting a trademark for 'butcher' then stopping all butchers from being able to use that word.
You could get a TM for 'butcher', but not for the catagory which covers butchers, only in catagories which bear no understandable relevance.
Isn't this like getting a TM on the word computer ?
I don't accept that the company can do this even though it looks like they have other the last 3 decades.
Maybe the TM needs to be reviewed ?
This reminds me of BT claiming they had the trademark on "hyperlink". Lunacy.
Separate names with a comma.