Discussion in 'Drop catching Domain Names' started by Whois-Search, Jan 25, 2006.
Maybe I could get my brother a tag too ?
Im thinking about adopting an African tribe and getting them one each.
Is that comment directed at me whois-search?
Good Catch Mr Reeves
Yes good one at 23.02 PM when I was out of DAC quota with only and only one TAG.
yes something like TSUNAVANKONOGOVA would just do it
See someone also has inventions.co.uk
The Fang tribe are especially interesting as they put the dead bones into boxes and these bones have the same power as when they were alive.
Dead persons TAGs - don't see that banned in the terms and conditions.
FOCUSD1G1TAL aka M Reeves aka Me has inventions.co.uk (along with inventors.co.uk and a whole host of premium domains). I was dropcatching .co.uk names before the majority of the people on this board even knew what dropcatching was. I have no connection whatsoever with the REEVES tag and I challenge anyone to provide any shred of evidence to the contrary. Give me some credit - if I was going to go to the trouble of getting an extra "helper" tag, it's hardly likely I would do it under my own family name. For the benefit of whois-search I have one brother and his name is Colin.
idiots all around
they accuse anyone who fit under their super-deduction skills, comparing surnames or postcodes.
idiots do not understand that those who want to hide would not leave so obvious traces
This thread is inappropriate and unhelpful for the reputation of the forum
I suggest admin should close it
I made no accusations whatsoever, I merely pointed out the name inventions.co.uk was registered. Why does thou protest so much ?.
Well said vizzy.
Though I also had no intention of associating M.Reeves of other Reeves' business, and hope now that just by adding to the post I didn't somehow implicitly justify the (implied) accusation.
But I do like my dead man TAG idea!
And why would a word like inventions.co.uk not be registered? every half decent word is registered. Your post and the use of the word "also" had one purpose which is obvious to everybody and that is to imply some sort of connection. Let me make this crystal.co.uk clear, if I really felt like protesting i'd be talking to my lawyers, but as it stands I simply find the bad.co.uk conspiracy.co.uk theories on this forum to be absolutely fabulous.co.uk entertainment, so please continue.
Lol, dont take it to heart as nothing was intended. I seriously couldnt give a stuff, and sorry if I fueled the fire,but youve gotta admit it was a relevant coincidence which was pointed out.
I was not taking it to heart. Irrespective of your intentions it was childish and inappropriate behaviour that needed to be addressed.
can i close this thread now it is solved ???
You can do whatever you wish. I have no preference.
Separate names with a comma.