First change is on the nom-announce email: Which is fair enough...... Then on the agenda and papers for the next PAB meeting in Jan: Next Meeting There is a paper by Hazel Pegg on the "Composition of the PAB": http://www.nominet.org.uk/digitalAssets/10714_070102_PAB_Composition.pdf Interesting suggestions: So..... 9 appointed members would see the current 2 board members and the 7 Representatives of Appointed Organisations back on the PAB: Policy Advisory Body While the number of Elected Members members gets cut down to 3? Also making it much much harder to get on the PAB than it is now? I feel this will lead to Nominet members not having a voice at the PAB table and will make it easier for the board to agree with the PAB. Example: DRS response Eric Ramage (wrote the DRS) v James Conaghan (other issues) which will go to the board that includes ***** Taylor (wrote the DRS). http://www.acorndomains.co.uk/domain-name-disputes/13363-pab-sub-committee-feedback-review-drs.html At this point I would like to propose a change: You can't be on the PAB or a non-executive board member for more than 4 years (2 terms) P.S. we are still waiting for the Code of Conduct paper.