Do any of you use stock photography on your websites? Read an article recently saying that a company was being threatened with a bill for £x,xxx for the use of a photo they had already paid for. This photo was purchased by the company in good faith from a stock photography website but the user who uploaded and sold these did not have the permission to do so. Basically the view was the company could still be liable for the £x,xxx fee if went to court, even though they 'paid' for the photo and were completely unaware - this is based on the assumption that this is not an excuse for copyright infringment. Just a risk we live with??? I can see a scam coming on with this type of ruling!