Discussion in 'Domain Name Disputes' started by grandin, Sep 3, 2007.
public decision.. http://www.nominet.org.uk/digitalAssets/21873_rileys.pdf
Quote of the day:
The complaint was dismissed if anyone wants to know!!
Well done Lee!
business as usual
Yes Fred, what is usual for Acorn is obviously not as usual for experts...
...Once upon a time, as part of a DRS consultation, a wise old expert wrote...
in-law a non defended complaint is judged in favour of the complainant
indeed...the expert failed to defend the attack element of my response
Strange that TW did not know you were Mr GHD!
Didn't know or created distance between the role of expert and that of DRS supreme.. He did say, he didn't conduct any further research over and above that supplied by the complainant.."selective" research?
Congrats! Is it going to Appeal?
Interesting that the expert did not access the prss system between the complaint and the decision. I would assume the expert's firm does not subscribe to the prss...
Beasty, Nominet told me that a respondent or complainant can appeal a decision to have the appeal panel to answer procedural issues, saying that who wants to fork out £3k
I hope it goes to appeal so I can ask the appeal panel to address the first part of my response
Separate names with a comma.