Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.

2014 Board Election

Discussion in 'Nominet General Information' started by AssetDomains, Mar 13, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. invincible

    invincible Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2005
    Posts:
    4,203
    Likes Received:
    101

    The problem with using made up terms such as "domainer" is they have the annoying effect of simplifying something that shouldn't be simplified so much. Many that invest in domain names do so in all manner of ways.


    (from iPhone)
     
  2. Domain Forum

    Acorn Domains Elite Member

    Joined:
    1999
    Messages:
    Many
    Likes Received:
    Lots
    IWA Meetup
     
  3. Retired_Member42

    Retired_Member42 Retired Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2009
    Posts:
    1,199
    Likes Received:
    22
    I agree completely. It's a vast scope. I've been labelled as "anti-domainer" in the past when I'm really not. I'm simply against false selling tactics such as "buy this and get top of Google" and "investors" hoarding thousands of domains and pricing people who want to legitmately use them out of the market.

    The buy to let landlords comparison is actually a good one. Sure everybody does it to make money but at least they're been sold on / rented at the market rate. Some domain "investors" do the property equivalent of buying a house next to somebody's sick grandmother and selling to her grandson at 10x the asking price.
     
  4. Skinner

    Skinner Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2008
    Posts:
    4,616
    Likes Received:
    140
    This debate is moot, 1and1, host europe et al are set to become the new "bogeyman", the only difference is they will "tasting" names so have insider knowledge meaning they scoop a wider range of names, and massively deeper pockets increasing the range further.

    Imagine this tag line in a movie voice over "This summer, Evil has a new face...".
     
  5. Hazel Pegg

    Hazel Pegg Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2006
    Posts:
    315
    Likes Received:
    12
    I don't hate the individuals Julian. I've met several and most are quite pleasant people. I just don't like the business model.
     
  6. Hazel Pegg

    Hazel Pegg Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2006
    Posts:
    315
    Likes Received:
    12
    So you did Julian. My apologies for forgetting that. I didn't take it seriously as it was never seriousloy for sale.
     
  7. Hazel Pegg

    Hazel Pegg Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2006
    Posts:
    315
    Likes Received:
    12
    Not a situation that I like. A cynic might suggest that the new Registrar Agreement is designed to take the secondary market world of domain name trading out of the hands of individuals and consolidate the industry in the hands of a few major players. IMPO this is not an improvement on the previous situation. I have tried and failed to find the public benefit in allowing Accredited Registrars their new freedom to become 'domainers''.
     
  8. websaway United Kingdom

    websaway Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2007
    Posts:
    5,336
    Likes Received:
    156
    It's ok not liking things if you have a sensible alternative.
    You don't like capitalism, yet there is no feasible alternative.
    You don't like the Tories and yet there has so far proved to be no feasible alternative and you admit, although not liking the secondary market that it is a necessary evil.
    I can admire anyone saying what they think but how they think may be questionable.
     
  9. websaway United Kingdom

    websaway Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2007
    Posts:
    5,336
    Likes Received:
    156
    I find broad unqualified statements don't really help and if you look at what you are saying you may need to give it some more thought.
    If someone registers "thousands of obscure crap names" and slaps a £xxxx price tag on them, then it's a recipe for disaster because it's costing thousands of pounds a year to renew them and there would not be enough hapless noods to sustain the model. So more to be pitied than disdained.
     
  10. Retired_Member42

    Retired_Member42 Retired Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2009
    Posts:
    1,199
    Likes Received:
    22
    If only that were true. Unfortunately renewal costs are that cheap for tag holders it only takes ripping off a few people a year to fund renewals on 1k+ domains. People seem happy enough to do this and are happy to break even or make a 1-2% return. Sure, they're well with their rights to do this but I can see why people have an issue with the model.

    You only have to look at how many domains get dropped that were previously for sale for £XXX - £XXXX. If you genuinely believe a domain is worth £XXX - you renew it. If you don't renew it, you don't think it's worth anything close to that which in my opinion is a borderline scam.
     
  11. Retired_Member42

    Retired_Member42 Retired Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2009
    Posts:
    1,199
    Likes Received:
    22
    I don't think much will change to be honest. I can't see many people giving the registrars outright permission to take their domain name. But even if they do, I'm sure they'll sell at a reasonable price or go to auction which I'm fine with also. I don't mind paying market rate for any domain I'm after... It's much better than somebody catching it, slapping a £XXXX price tag on it and waiting 10 years for that one perfect buyer to come along.

    Supposing some domain you wanted to develop is pending drop. Where would you rather buy it from? A public auction which will let the market determine the price or some drop catcher who will price you out of the market and wait around for somebody with deeper pockets years down the line.
     
  12. websaway United Kingdom

    websaway Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2007
    Posts:
    5,336
    Likes Received:
    156
    There is an issue concerning the penguin thing and in that case millions of domains that had high keyword search values have become less valuable. You can not blame the owners who registered them in good faith trying to sell them before letting them drop.
    Most that I see are selling them off for low xx to try to mitigate their losses.
    One man's rubbish is another's treasure.
    The secondary market has changed massively and it will take time to filter down, it took 15 years for some people to take notice of the potential of domain names, you are not going to suddenly re-educate overnight.
     
  13. Edwin

    Edwin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2005
    Posts:
    9,851
    Likes Received:
    617
    Spot on. You only have to rewind a couple of years or so to find tips about securing exact match domains plastered all over the leading, reputable SEO advice sites. Why? Simple: it WORKED!

    In those days, securing the right domain name was a pretty much sure fire way to boost your rankings, often catapulting you into the top few results for that search.

    As such, exact match domains represented a great SEO investment for many companies, and domain investor portfolios (and prices) reflected that.

    But things change, just like in any industry. And you have to adapt right alongside.

    Domains that had pretty much all their latent value tied up in this SEO aspect naturally dropped out of fashion afterwards (as it should be) and have been actively scrubbed from many portfolios at renewal time.

    That action (scrubbing the domains) doesn't say anything about the "historic value", only about the "now value". At the time, they WERE valuable. Now, they're not. It's just "change".
     
  14. Retired_Member42

    Retired_Member42 Retired Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2009
    Posts:
    1,199
    Likes Received:
    22
    *Removed at Edwins request.
     
    Last edited: Apr 1, 2014
  15. Edwin

    Edwin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2005
    Posts:
    9,851
    Likes Received:
    617
    We already have, several times, and have dropped over 1,000 of the longer tail names that were mainly SEO plays. We will continue to evaluate each name at renewal time and will no doubt be dropping more. I've noticed many other large portfolio owners are doing exactly the same thing - which makes sense, since it's the LOGICAL thing to do. As I said, change comes to every industry - the domain industry's not immune.

    At the same time, SEO is far from the be all, end all as far as generic domains go. It's worth skimming over the comments from successful business owners talking about their exact match domains to see just how few are SEO related...
    http://www.webmastering.co.uk/domai...importance-of-their-exact-match-domain-names/

    There's a lot there about credibility, owning the best name, punching above their weight, improving their PPC (unaffected by Google's treatment of exact match domains), securing investment more easily, etc. - and relatively little about SEO.
     
    Last edited: Apr 1, 2014
  16. Retired_Member38

    Retired_Member38 Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 2013
    Posts:
    1,742
    Likes Received:
    41
    That post makes a lot of sense.



    But it seems ridiculous when compared to your portfolio of domains including 5 word emd's for £1250+ vat :lol:
     
  17. Edwin

    Edwin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2005
    Posts:
    9,851
    Likes Received:
    617
    Why make it personal?

    If you have a problem with me, please take it to the PM system. Don't clutter up what has been a relatively interesting thread with it. Thanks.
     
  18. Retired_Member42

    Retired_Member42 Retired Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2009
    Posts:
    1,199
    Likes Received:
    22
    *Removed at Edwins request.
     
    Last edited: Apr 1, 2014
  19. Retired_Member38

    Retired_Member38 Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 2013
    Posts:
    1,742
    Likes Received:
    41

    I don't have any problem with you or your domain sales, just the business model in general. But like Redemption says you're completely contradicting yourself with what you say publicly, and how you price your domains.

    Either emd's are no longer worth what they were years ago, or offering [removed at the request of Edwin]/co/uk for £1250+vat is fair price.

    You can't have both of them, so which of those statements is correct?
     
    Last edited: Apr 1, 2014
  20. RobM

    RobM Retired Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2012
    Posts:
    3,273
    Likes Received:
    470
    Just look at who will benefit and who they are related to and/or friends with. Shouldn't be too hard to see why this has been pushed through. I doubt *public* benefit was ever a factor.
     
  21. Retired_Member38

    Retired_Member38 Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 2013
    Posts:
    1,742
    Likes Received:
    41
    I would imagine registrars are far more likely to immediately push domains to auction - this is far better for end users than them being hoarded for years.

    It seems to me that its a good way to process dropped domains? Unless you're a drop catcher of course.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.