Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.

flip.uk - .UK Domain Auctions and Marketplace

Discussion in 'Domain Tools' started by lazarus, May 3, 2020.

  1. ukbackorder

    ukbackorder Active Member ukbackorder.com
    Bronze Member

    Joined:
    May 2020
    Posts:
    785
    Likes Received:
    147
    Maybe put a filter option not to show reserve auctions which can be saved to the account?
     
  2. Domain Forum

    Acorn Domains Elite Member

    Joined:
    1999
    Messages:
    Many
    Likes Received:
    Lots
    IWA Meetup
     
  3. super-whois

    super-whois Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2008
    Posts:
    347
    Likes Received:
    86
    I don't think a reserve would normally be an issue, it only becomes problematic when the reserve is unrealistic, or is aimed at the end user, rather than a trade sale.

    I think unrealistic reserves devalue the platform, and I'm sure one site used to charge 5% to list a name with a reserve, as a way to discourage its use. Maybe reserves should be capped, or instead of a reserve, the name is simply listed with a higher starting bid.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. DJ

    DJ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2019
    Posts:
    1,774
    Likes Received:
    203
    I'm not sure I fully agree with this as this will effect genuine sellers who set modest and realistic reserves.

    The issue is that there are a few users that are constantly flooding the auctions with unrealistic reserve prices. I would rather see a cap implemented on the amount of auctions you can run with a reserve price (a maximum of 1 or 2) as well as a restriction to a name being relisted within a timeframe unless it is reduced. I would also welcome a cap to how many active auctions a user can have running at anyone time, regardless of reserve. The amount could be increased by the amount of feedback a user has. Or could be increased as soon as an active auction will sell (i.e. it has been bid on and the reserve has been met).

    I am sorry to be negative Colin as I know you are working hard and the platform and concept has the potential to be great, but I feel the site has stagnated over the last couple of months and any early momentum you had, is sadly starting to fade away - and I truly believe this is a result of 2 or 3 users abusing the fact you are offering a free platform without any barriers to entry. Maybe the data would prove me wrong but this is just my opinion.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. ukbackorder

    ukbackorder Active Member ukbackorder.com
    Bronze Member

    Joined:
    May 2020
    Posts:
    785
    Likes Received:
    147
    How many domains with reserve do you see selling at any auction platforms? A very small percentage. There is a reason for that - people with reserves usually have unrealistically high expectations. A filter would give people the option not to have to wade through any of them. People don't have to use it.
     
  6. DJ

    DJ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2019
    Posts:
    1,774
    Likes Received:
    203
    In general I agree and this is why I have suggested scrapping reserves in the past and allowing users to set the starting price.

    I sold floorplans.co.uk on flip a few months back which had a modest reserve and knit.uk also sold recently which had a reserve also. So some users will use it as a genuine failsafe, but most, I agree, will have unrealistic expectations.
     
  7. lazarus

    lazarus Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2013
    Posts:
    1,485
    Likes Received:
    409
    @Pedigree In regards to stats... Traffic wise, sales and new users have never been better. And because of all the new users, getting top dollar for your domain is at parity. Definitely not stagnant or losing traction :) As you can see the current running Showcase auctions is on par with any other. The gap has been closed and I am very pleased with the pace at which it has done so.

    BTW Congrats to @super-whois with 2 cracking auction sales this week :)

    There will be restrictions in regards to rotating domains, this makes sense. At the same time, the last thing I want to do is over police / restrict it and set up barriers, but instead get the algo just right. As discussed in another thread, let the users decide what belongs in the Showcase section. And anyone that does not have time to go through the whole list, just keep to the Showcase section.

    Personally, I am not a fan of reserves but some are so we have to have them. I am not convinced that having a user defined starting price is a good idea. I think this has more negatives than positives. But I wont be the first time I have been wrong :p
    Does anyone else have any thoughts about it?

    But back to the reserve indicator. I have now implemented it as a trial to see how it goes. I think, its a win - win but we will see.

    Cheers, Colin
     
    • Like Like x 2
    Last edited: Feb 27, 2021
  8. bluerock United Kingdom

    bluerock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2005
    Posts:
    12,381
    Likes Received:
    137
    There are several what I would call "not worth reg fee" names on there with reserves in the £xxxx category. It just dilutes from the positive elements of the site.
    I've only used a reserve once and it was a realistic reserve which was met. Its too easy to list crap/misspell names at £xxxx in the hope some idiot will come along.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. super-whois

    super-whois Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2008
    Posts:
    347
    Likes Received:
    86
    I think they might have more luck using their investment to register the output of the Cipher Block Chaining.
     
  10. DJ

    DJ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2019
    Posts:
    1,774
    Likes Received:
    203
    I agree, the reserve indicator is a good idea but it just highlights and proves what I have been saying for sometime.

    One user currently has 28 listings all with reserves and has maintained this amount on the platform for months. I doubt they have actually sold anything as they have no feedback from buyers.

    Another user has 29 auctions, many without reserve to be fair, but a lot are as you described. They have also maintained this level of activity for months but their feedback would suggest they have only sold 3 names.

    There are currently 81 active auctions so the 2 users above account for 70% of them.

    My opinion still is that the amount of auctions that a user can have running at anyone time should be limited. This number could increase once the seller has received a certain amount of feedback. There is a marketplace that users can use to list their names with a buy it now price, so users should set buy it now prices for there names instead of flooding the auctions.

    Anyway, I don't want to sound like a broken record so this will be the last I will say on the matter.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  11. lazarus

    lazarus Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2013
    Posts:
    1,485
    Likes Received:
    409
    Hi All,

    Just wanted to run this past you all.

    In order to drastically reduce the amount of low quality reserved auctions how does this sound?

    upload_2021-3-5_12-42-13.png

    *5-9
    Please let me know your thoughts, Cheers, Colin

    Edit: Maybe a member with 0 feedback should be allowed to have at least one reserve auction?
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
    • Like Like x 1
    Last edited: Mar 5, 2021
  12. webber

    webber Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2019
    Posts:
    766
    Likes Received:
    235
    The principle is great!
    The maximum Reserve Auctions you can list could start at 1, like you suggested, so that this is not a barrier in using the full functionality of the website but rather a temporary limit.
    I would also think similarly tiered limits can be applied to how many Auctions you can have with or without Reserve.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. lazarus

    lazarus Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2013
    Posts:
    1,485
    Likes Received:
    409
    Yea. Getting the numbers right, is tricky. I will have a think about including numbers for the "total number of auctions" allowed and post up a table soon.

    Cheers
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. DJ

    DJ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2019
    Posts:
    1,774
    Likes Received:
    203
    I would suggest this

    1-4 ...... 1 Reserve 5 Overall
    5-9 ...... 2 Reserve 10 Overall
    10-14 ...... 3 Reserve 15 Overall
    15-20 ...... 5 Reserve 20 Overall
    20+ ...... 10 Reserve 25 Overall

    Just my opinion but I feel the overall should be limited also. It might encourage people to run shorter auctions which will create a higher turnover.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  15. lazarus

    lazarus Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2013
    Posts:
    1,485
    Likes Received:
    409
    Yep that look like a good and fair balance. I will get busy implementing it :)
    Thanks everyone for the input!

    Cheers, Colin
     
    • Like Like x 2
  16. bluerock United Kingdom

    bluerock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2005
    Posts:
    12,381
    Likes Received:
    137
    The principle is good but while I've sold a few names on there not everyone completes the feedback. I only have 3 feedback comments left as an example. Maybe completed sales instead of a feedback score? Just a thought.

    EDIT: The two posts above look good and should work fine :)
     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. super-whois

    super-whois Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2008
    Posts:
    347
    Likes Received:
    86
    I would suggest a limit based on number of auctions without bids, rather than including auctions with bids. Although there is a danger some might try to play the system with shill bidding, but at least there's no incentive to avoid a £5 listing fee.
     
  18. lazarus

    lazarus Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2013
    Posts:
    1,485
    Likes Received:
    409
    Hi all, I have implemented the auction caps. :) No doubt we will now see less rotated reserve auctions.


    upload_2021-3-10_1-25-22.png
     
    • Like Like x 3
    Last edited: Mar 10, 2021
  19. lazarus

    lazarus Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2013
    Posts:
    1,485
    Likes Received:
    409
    That's a good idea, We'll see how it goes. I think for most users, the capping is generous. It's only the odd few that it will impact on.
     
  20. bluerock United Kingdom

    bluerock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2005
    Posts:
    12,381
    Likes Received:
    137
    It seems I'm in the odd few category.
    The problem I highlighted is the case. That the quota only goes off feedback, if no feedback is left the auction limits do not increase.

    To highlight this I have 9 completed sales and only 3 feedback responses. There is no incentive for buyers to complete feedback.
     
    Last edited: Mar 10, 2021
  21. DJ

    DJ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2019
    Posts:
    1,774
    Likes Received:
    203
    People generally do if you send them a message to ask them to.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    Last edited: Mar 10, 2021