Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.

Understanding systemic inequality in digital skills

Discussion in 'Nominet General Information' started by Acorn Newsbot, Dec 20, 2021.

  1. Acorn Newsbot

    Acorn Newsbot Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2006
    Posts:
    22,540
    Likes Received:
    48
    Digital skills can be positively transformative for some young people, in terms of their education, social life, future employment and career progression, though it is a true marker of disadvantage and displacement for those without them. But ‘digital skills’ can be a broad term, covering a wide range of competencies and interpreted differently by different stakeholders. More needs to be done to uncover the root causes for why so many young people remain excluded from work due to inaccessible digital skills or specifically within digital roles requiring advanced skills.

    Catch22 and Nominet have partnered with Bean Research to create a series of four insight papers to gain deeper insights into the barriers some of the most disadvantaged groups in the UK face when it comes to digital skills and access.

    The first paper – launched at the end of November 2021 – sets the scene for the proceeding papers, highlighting both the exciting opportunities presented from the growing digital economy and the substantial barriers disadvantaged communities face in accessing these opportunities.

    What is so timely about this research is laying out the existing thinking about different definitions of digital skills. This is going to help us to move closer to a shared language to better understand the landscape and to effectively marry strategies to meet unmet needs. We face a situation where, while unemployment for young people remains pervasive, tech sector vacancies stand at over 100,000 per month in the fastest growing sector in the UK economy. These papers are the start of a journey to enable employers, Government and UK youth services to work together to understand this gap and why approaches to date haven’t been working.

    Kat Dixon from Catch22 says: “Digital careers offer an incredible opportunity for economic inclusion, social mobility and equality. We embarked on this research to build a richer picture of pathways into digital careers and how employers, government and the third sector can pull together to build the future UK workforce.”

    The launch of the Nominet Digital Youth Index in early November 2021 brought some related insights on Digital Skills to the fore.

    Justin Spooner from Unthinkable shared this view: “An aspect of digital learning that can sometimes be forgotten is how effective it can be for creating what I call a connected learning culture – a way in which we are better able to learn with and from each other. This is something that can happen both in the formal context of school and college but of course massively happens in all the other aspects of young people’s lives.” – Read more: Asking all the big questions – Digital Youth Index

    Amy O’Donnell from Nominet’s social impact team said: “One of the most striking findings from the Digital Youth Index for me was how almost half of young people (48%) are primarily teaching themselves digital skills, equivalent to 6.9 million young people, often by its nature informal, with little input from parents or teachers. If we are to ensure we leave no-one behind, we must think structurally in multiple, cross-cutting spectrums in the way digital spaces mirror inequalities in society. In many instances, digital realities even exacerbate these inequalities. It’s a much-repeated lesson that digital is not a passive equaliser, so can we pinpoint what new forms of inequity are becoming apparent that can be put down to changes in digital access and skills?” Read More: “You’re on mute!”: Not just digital skills, but skills to thrive in a Digital Age – Digital Youth Index

    The Digital Youth Index also found that tech jobs are most appealing to young children, young men and those from wealthier families. Digital careers offer higher pay and opportunities for progression – so making them more accessible for minority or marginalised groups potentially has a levelling effect in our unequal society.

    But it’s more than that. It’s no surprise that those involved in the design of digital services end up reflecting the types of users who engage with these services. In turn, this affects who shows up in data, informs decision making or resource allocation. In other words: it shows where power lies.

    Working on the diversity of digital design is more than just a tick box. Supporting more women, people of colour, people with disabilities and those from lower income families into digital careers holds inherent value and is fundamental to realising a vibrant and representative digital economy.

    Nominet is delighted to support the launch of this research and looks forward to welcoming your feedback, further discussion and the series to come.

    Read more on the Catch 22 blog including access to the recording of the launch event including youth panel: Catch22 and Nominet launch first in series of 4 insights papers looking at barriers to digital skills and access – Catch22 (catch-22.org.uk)

    The post Understanding systemic inequality in digital skills appeared first on Nominet.

    Continue reading...
     
  2. Domain Forum

    Acorn Domains Elite Member

    Joined:
    1999
    Messages:
    Many
    Likes Received:
    Lots
    IWA Meetup
     
  3. ukbackorder

    ukbackorder Active Member ukbackorder.com
    Bronze Member

    Joined:
    May 2020
    Posts:
    786
    Likes Received:
    147
    More woke PC twaddle. Not everyone has the same academic ability nor interest. Giving digital jobs to people who lack basic skills or interest in the subject is not 'inclusive', it just means you end up with a company of box-tickers who lack the abilities to do their job efficiently and effectively......like nominet. I have read post after post banging on about inclusiveness, minorities, gender and sexuality issues etc and never one about actually *improving* the current service of the, you know, interwebz thingy networky type business that you are supposed to provide, which is incredibly poor. Try working on weekends for a start and learning how to do your current job before bragging about employing more 'diverse' people unable to do it as well.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
    Last edited: Dec 20, 2021
  4. Ben Thomas

    Ben Thomas Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2018
    Posts:
    2,621
    Likes Received:
    363
    Welcome to the 2020's, where if you're not offending someone - somewhere, you're doing it wrong.
     
  5. lazarus

    lazarus Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2013
    Posts:
    1,485
    Likes Received:
    409
    Filling positions based on race or sexual orientation instead of pure merit is a very bad idea for any business.
    Everyone should have a fair shot and once evaluated on there ability, only then should they be considered for that job.

    It's Tokenism, and has no place in the hiring process, it's just wrong and discriminative. It should be seen for what it really is.

    No ones has a problem if you are black, white, pink, gay or a unicorn as long as you are the most capable person... who cares.
     
  6. ukbackorder

    ukbackorder Active Member ukbackorder.com
    Bronze Member

    Joined:
    May 2020
    Posts:
    786
    Likes Received:
    147
    I have to admit that if a unicorn came to me for a job I'd start to seriously regret my acid house days of the 90s. But yes I agree with your point. Nominet are like a little child constantly craving positive affirmation from the grown-ups. All they have to do is their job. The sad thing is I doubt anybody there will even see this letalone care.
     
  7. boxerdog

    boxerdog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2007
    Posts:
    5,409
    Likes Received:
    140
    Oh how I miss my acid house and the 90s!!
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1