Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.

Interesting

Discussion in 'Domain Name Disputes' started by grandin, Feb 28, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. grandin United Kingdom

    grandin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 2006
    Posts:
    1,304
    Likes Received:
    10
  2. Domain Forum

    Acorn Domains Elite Member

    Joined:
    1999
    Messages:
    Many
    Likes Received:
    Lots
    IWA Meetup
     
  3. sneezycheese

    sneezycheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2005
    Posts:
    549
    Likes Received:
    15
    ...A good news story, with what I see as a sensible common sense outcome.

    Lets hope we see more of these kind of results, both in UDRP and DRS cases!

    Regards,

    Sneezy.
     
  4. grandin United Kingdom

    grandin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 2006
    Posts:
    1,304
    Likes Received:
    10
    judges judge humanity

    Indeed, judges judge us human beings.. What they do is judge whether what one human does to another is unfair. Judging does not need a legal background, judging needs an ability to understand humans. DRS experts have got so screwed up in legalities that they can't see consumerism and don't understand the human motivation to buy and sell....

    Simple things are simple things....a legal person can quote any act they so wish but at the end of the day common sense has to prevail OR humand kind fails.

    Acts of parliamnet can only guide, what is important is the relative hurt caused by ones actions:-

    If Virgin claim a right to virgintv then that must be down to some hot headed ego driven individual who can't see his bit from his other bit....thus at the end of the day ego will turn...rights are rigths and common sense must be prevail unlike EURID's assertion.

    Long live humans...lol
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.