Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.

Decision in waynerooney.com case

Discussion in 'Domain Name Disputes' started by retired_member12, Oct 13, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. retired_member12

    retired_member12 Retired Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2006
    Posts:
    1,498
    Likes Received:
    22
  2. Beasty

    Beasty Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2006
    Posts:
    595
    Likes Received:
    8
    Last edited: Oct 14, 2006
  3. Whois-Search

    Whois-Search Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2004
    Posts:
    1,970
    Likes Received:
    150
    Rooney scores! | The Register

    How can Willoughby be involved in .com decisions and .co.uk decisions at the same time?

    For example could he have been the expert on WayneRooney.com and WayneRooney.co.uk?

    Or did they get Andrew Murray to do the .co.uk because he can say:

     
  4. sneezycheese

    sneezycheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2005
    Posts:
    549
    Likes Received:
    15
    :twisted: Ye Ha - we're gona clear out this town - lets get um boys... :twisted:
     

    Attached Files:

  5. pendragon United Kingdom

    pendragon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2006
    Posts:
    4,211
    Likes Received:
    17
    post deleted by pen
     
    Last edited: Oct 15, 2006
  6. grandin United Kingdom

    grandin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 2006
    Posts:
    1,304
    Likes Received:
    10
    Our society

    I get this growing feeling that you are guilty until you provide evidence to the contrary...surely this is against our legal system?

    Tony said in the WIPO case 'Whether his stated intention would have been enough for this purpose is an open question.'

    Is that a question Tony has a right to answer??

    Lee
     
  7. domaingenius

    domaingenius Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2004
    Posts:
    1,386
    Likes Received:
    10
    DRS should be based on FACTS not personal opinions or guesswork. Nominet should do something constructive and give it to the Patent office to deal with based on strict TM laws.

    DG
     
  8. olebean United Kingdom

    olebean Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2005
    Posts:
    2,217
    Likes Received:
    29
    I am sure there would have been a media uproar if he hadn't have got hold of the domain(s)
     
  9. sneezycheese

    sneezycheese Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2005
    Posts:
    549
    Likes Received:
    15
    ...Agreed!

    I'm starting to think T.W. may be a tad biased. :rolleyes:

    Could it be that it is he that is in fact the root of all evil and not Nomint??? :shock:

    Is it the case that Nominet has sold their soul to this man? :twisted:

    It's all a bit Friday the 13th, if you ask me. :eek:

    Regards,

    Sneezy.

    PS: Maybe we should invite him to the Acorn get together!
     
  10. Dods

    Dods Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2006
    Posts:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't really know anything about these laws or this case at all to be honest, but I did have a question about this:
    "A ruling was made that the domain name must be handed to the Manchester United striker and his management company". - Quote from BBC News website.

    So my question is this. If another person with the name Wayne Rooney came forward and said they should get it - who would get it?
    Surely they couldn't just give it to the famous Rooney because he is famous or has better legal representation?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.