• Upgrade
  • Advertise
    • Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.

    Time window to register domain using DAC

    Discussion in 'Drop catching Domain Names' started by Slater, Oct 3, 2006.

    Thread Status:
    Not open for further replies.
    1. Slater United Kingdom

      Slater Active Member

      Joined:
      Apr 2006
      Posts:
      830
      Likes Received:
      10
      On quality drops how soon after the name has dropped does your DAC request have to be to stand a reasonable chance of catching the name ?
       
      Slater, Oct 3, 2006
      Slater, Oct 3, 2006
      #1
    2. tifosi United Kingdom

      tifosi Well-Known Member

      Joined:
      Oct 2004
      Posts:
      3,414
      Likes Received:
      55
      100ms tops... frequently <20ms
       
      tifosi, Oct 3, 2006
      tifosi, Oct 3, 2006
      #2
    3. retired member 1

      retired member 1 Retired Member

      Joined:
      Apr 2005
      Posts:
      634
      Likes Received:
      15
      That's damn quick! :shock:
       
      retired member 1, Oct 3, 2006
      retired member 1, Oct 3, 2006
      #3
    4. retired_member26

      retired_member26 Banned

      Joined:
      Oct 2004
      Posts:
      748
      Likes Received:
      12
      Look for the other side (IMHO): how to send your email rather than reaction.
       
      retired_member26, Oct 3, 2006
      retired_member26, Oct 3, 2006
      #4
    5. Slater United Kingdom

      Slater Active Member

      Joined:
      Apr 2006
      Posts:
      830
      Likes Received:
      10
      Thanks for input guys.

      After major tweaks to script managed to get cycle of sending DAC request, receiving reply, analysing it and getting email off to Nominet down to around 3ms.

      Whether it'll make any difference to catching domains only time will tell, still major limiting factor is the relatively huge delay between each DAC queery.

      Mark.
       
      Last edited: Oct 6, 2006
      Slater, Oct 6, 2006
      Slater, Oct 6, 2006
      #5
    6. aqls

      aqls Well-Known Member

      Joined:
      Nov 2005
      Posts:
      1,042
      Likes Received:
      26
      Care to pm how you got the smtp down below 3 seconds? :oops:

      -aqls-
       
      aqls, Oct 6, 2006
      aqls, Oct 6, 2006
      #6
    7. Slater United Kingdom

      Slater Active Member

      Joined:
      Apr 2006
      Posts:
      830
      Likes Received:
      10
      Now that would be telling :)
       
      Slater, Oct 6, 2006
      Slater, Oct 6, 2006
      #7
    8. aquanuke

      aquanuke Well-Known Member

      Joined:
      May 2005
      Posts:
      2,040
      Likes Received:
      42
      Thats easy dont use SMTP ;)
       
      aquanuke, Oct 6, 2006
      aquanuke, Oct 6, 2006
      #8
    9. aqls

      aqls Well-Known Member

      Joined:
      Nov 2005
      Posts:
      1,042
      Likes Received:
      26
      thank you :D

      -aqls-
       
      Last edited: Oct 6, 2006
      aqls, Oct 6, 2006
      aqls, Oct 6, 2006
      #9
    10. retired_member26

      retired_member26 Banned

      Joined:
      Oct 2004
      Posts:
      748
      Likes Received:
      12

      There is something wrong in your calculation. The maximum reaction time of dac only is 7 ms.

      Send me PM to discuss
       
      retired_member26, Oct 6, 2006
      retired_member26, Oct 6, 2006
      #10
    11. Slater United Kingdom

      Slater Active Member

      Joined:
      Apr 2006
      Posts:
      830
      Likes Received:
      10
      Clearly I'm not going to discuss my script or server config with another catcher, all I will say is that I'm seeing faster DAC response times than 7ms.:)
       
      Last edited: Oct 7, 2006
      Slater, Oct 7, 2006
      Slater, Oct 7, 2006
      #11
    12. retired_member26

      retired_member26 Banned

      Joined:
      Oct 2004
      Posts:
      748
      Likes Received:
      12
      Sorry I red your answer wrong. Good luck with your script.

      turNIC
       
      retired_member26, Oct 8, 2006
      retired_member26, Oct 8, 2006
      #12
    Thread Status:
    Not open for further replies.

    ▲