UDRP: WIPO letter to ICANN

[Whois-Search]

Interesting letter:

http://www.icann.org/correspondence/gurry-to-twomey-04jul07.pdf

 

[Johnp]

Would be a nice letter I think, because most of your posts are interesting, but the link is not working for me. !


JohnP

 

[Whois-Search]

Would be a nice letter I think, because most of your posts are interesting, but the link is not working for me. !

Have you got this: http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html

 

[Johnp]

Silly me - a security setting in Zonealarm was stopping all PDFs from displaying. My appologies.


JohnP

 

[Beasty]

Very interesting.

I recently raised the issue of supplemental submissions under the UDRP - notably allowed by unlawful Supplemental Rules operated by NAF. I should add that in this regard I do not think that WIPO's own practice is consistent with the UDRP.

The final paragraph on page 3 questions the merits of "the application of reduced panel fees in the case of respondent default..." Now who would have come up with that as a good idea in a dispute resolution service...