I'm looking forward to the domainers with deep ass pockets getting missile lock on nominet and starting the volley, successful or not it will be a war of attrition, and the prospect of some big holders portfolios and big website owners losing out means they will fight tooth and nail.
How much will it cost nom to defend an onslaught from 1000s of suits, frivolous or not they still have to reply and it still costs ?
How long before said onslaught starts eating away the profits and emptying the coffers ?
My pockets may not be that deep but I know many are.
Interesting to see a survey from Nominet about one of my renewals. Asks the question:
"What is/was jobsoncruiseships.co.uk intended for?"
A commercial or business information site
A commercial site processing online transactions (online shop)
A commercial or business email address
Hosting a pay per click advertising page
An investment to re-sell the domain name
To protect a name and prevent others from using it
Personal website or blog
Personal email address
A charity, club, not for profit, church, voluntary or association site
It was just reserved for future use
Technical/ web development/ experimental platform site
Educational site
Defensive registration – to protect my brand
It was registered but never actually used for anything
Other
Prefer not to say/ Don’t know
Very intrusive questions - from an organisation who said legal advice precluded them from emailing existing registrants about the direct.uk consultation.
Still promoting .co.uk quicksand.
https://twitter.com/BigCatEvents/status/342566717878317056/photo/1
If Nominet still proceed with direct.uk I personally believe it could turn out to be the biggest misselling scandal since PPI.
Interesting to see a survey from Nominet about one of my renewals. Asks the question:
"What is/was jobsoncruiseships.co.uk intended for?"
A commercial or business information site
A commercial site processing online transactions (online shop)
A commercial or business email address
Hosting a pay per click advertising page
An investment to re-sell the domain name
To protect a name and prevent others from using it
Personal website or blog
Personal email address
A charity, club, not for profit, church, voluntary or association site
It was just reserved for future use
Technical/ web development/ experimental platform site
Educational site
Defensive registration – to protect my brand
It was registered but never actually used for anything
Other
Prefer not to say/ Don’t know
I have always said it could leave Nominet insolvent. They raise 1 Billion at auction, quickly give it to the Trust. Then legal cases come in, 10 months later a judge orders it to reversed and auction fees returned.
Nominet has no cash, end of company.
It would appear they will not make a decision on direct uk in the very near future because they are carrying out a survey on non renewed domains and I would imagine that's to do with the decision process.
The longer it drags on the more uncertainty creeps into the uk domain market, it must be hurting some registrars.
When is the June meeting ?
Is there anyway the .uk proposal could go ahead and benefit domainors and the majority?.
They seem to be pretty keen to introduce it - the majority of the board are not really internet people, and they convinced the government that it will be safer. They presumably think it will excite the market. A related-diversification in banker's speak.
The question now is how to limit the damage when they go ahead, and protect the interests of domain investors and owners (small businesses, and brand holders alike). The .nz is interesting but don't believe the current board would be interested in following .nz models.