I'm obviously speculating, how can I know more than most current board members about their intentions?
I am looking at their outreach, their communications, their lack of candour in certain situations and transparency with the wider membership and the fact that they have launched this initiative without consulting first. Then consulted. Got a resounding 'don't do it' from the stakeholders. And have now reopened the issue.
I have also seen documents released under FOI, and I am aware that at least one major registrar that attended a meeting to discuss the .uk issue and was given the impression that it was a done-deal. I am sure if we had all been invited to discuss the idea, we would have been given the same impression.
Thanks for clearing that up for me, it didn't read like you were guessing it read like you had inside information.