Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.

No Nom Update!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think there were quite a few problems with the (much) earlier versions of the DAC that were caused by Oracle being buggy.

One would have thought that Oracle would be a bit more switched on / keen to help...
 
In my experience, oracle has just got lucky. They do have some good software, but it's buggy.

We abandoned Oracle at work for MySQL, and have had no complaints about it. Companies sometimes have issues with using 'open source' but not us ;)
 
Most people abandon Oracle for Postgre, but I guess with the advent of MySQL 5.0 and 5.1 it is starting to play catch-up.
I have this one client with a MySQL 4.1 server for whom I have shoved 8GB of data into tables for (using some special scripts that ran for about 2 weeks :) ). I managed to get their query times down from 30 seconds to under 1 second for searches. MySQL is deffinitely starting to join with the big boys.
 
The last month i've been working with a DB of about 45 million records across 1000 tables. Cross referenced queries are running at <0.5 seconds now down from over a minute on the previous solution.

MySQL is definately making insteps into the DB market :)
 
sweeeet ;)
Going from version 3.23 -> 4.1 is like changing product, all the features you could want (apart from stored procedures which are in v.5) and amazing speed increases (mainly due to decent key and query caching).
 
I noticed that on the site (not tried 5.1 yet though), could be very useful for DB/index clean-ups, especially if you delete a lot of records.
 
A-Wing said:
all the features you could want (apart from stored procedures which are in v.5)

Stored procedures always seem a pretty evil idea to me (I'm not a DBA, maybe they have greater tolerance for this kind of thing).

But having seen Nominet's struggle with Oracle bugs, I wouldn't really want anything to do with it :-)

P.
 
Stored Procedures are quite handy. If for example, you have one dedicated DB Server, and multiple web servers, if you need to edit a procedure, you can do it in one go on the DB Server, or edit the files across all the webservers!

I'm planning on using MySQL events for database optimising and running time sensitive queries.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Rule #1: Be Respectful

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Premium Members

New Threads

Domain Forum Friends

Lastest Listings

Our Mods' Businesses

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • Siusaidh AcornBot:
    Siusaidh has left the room.
      Siusaidh AcornBot: Siusaidh has left the room.
      Top Bottom