I'm at a bit of a loss, Starbird, to understand why it would be anti-competitive to auction off the names? I'm just interested to understand that case, not criticising your comment at all
As things stand, people already have no option but to pay Nominet £4 (through a registrar) if they want to buy a name that has dropped. Why is that any more or less competitive than paying £25 or £100 or £500 or whatever a name went for at a Nominet auction?
The option would be the same in either case: pay Nominet.
The difference would be that competition to purchase the dropping domains would be broadened to anyone in the public, and not the more limited pool of dropcatchers. You could argue that giving direct access to a wider group of the public is more competitive, not less competitive - with the added advantages that no-one would sit on the domain names for in some cases years, and the highest bidder would get immediate access. It would hugely impact drop catchers, because all the best names would be accessible direct from Nominet, but Nominet might argue that would reduce the drop catching process to near zero.
None of this would be a popular outcome for people who make good money from drop catching (many here on this forum) but it's one scenario. I guess someone has to be the devil's advocate. It's a model that's been obvious for years. The question is mainly: is it in the interests of the interested parties with most control or influence over Nominet, and in the interests of Nominet's brand and monetisation of domains?
To be honest, I'm quite surprised there hasn't been a move to classify key words into price categories such as 'premium'. There's precedent for that in plenty of the new TLDs. I'd hate that of course, but you have to be cold and ruthless and look options in the face. It's pointless just ignoring the options and hoping they'll go away. Always ask: what will a company do, faced with logic and the potential of different models to increase capital.
Anyway - it is the 'anti-competitive' argument I'm interested in, because that moves the decision-making towards legal territory or government intervention. How would administering the auctioning of domains be any less competitive than the selling off of domains Nominet already does? That's what they do. Sell domains. If they widen access, it seems like a push to say they would be anti-competitive, but I may well be missing a legal point here, which is why I'm asking.