A
Aaron Clifford
If that's what you feel then good luck, if only it was that simple.
These registrar 'tags' all have to have unique operators, entities or persons fronting them and someone to whom any domain names they catch are registered. They also need to be financed and managed. They can't all belong to the same person or entity because if they did I believe their EPP create quotas would be linked. It was only with the ROR release where quotas were not linked across credit accounts. In addition many such registrars require someone to provide them with a hosted drop catching system to even be able to operate as drop catchers because they are incapable of producing this sort of system them self. At the moment DAC hosts provide that for a great many registrars.
I accept there is an open ended debate about whether exponentially more non-linked registrar 'tags' providing more EPP Creates would really introduce much of a gain beyond just one, based on the assumption of a drop cycle involving unique drop times for each domain name being published. If only a single domain name drops at any given timestamp and if one has developed a new script which can deal with the time syncing and time offsets better than most others I am unsure how sending many more EPP Creates would be much of a benefit.
I also don't believe there is already a firm decision of an outcome. The idea of publishing drop lists with exact and unique domain name drop times seems to negate the requirement for many to make a significant number of DNS queries and DAC queries for both accurate list building and domain name drop catching. The live DAC might no longer need to be maintained and the complaints about technical flaws with its operation in respect of domain name drop catching would probably cease. The delayed DAC could be maintained for retail register web site "name spinners" and other operations.
Given I don't believe there is already a firm decided outcome, the consultation that is currently open affords anyone the opportunity of putting together alternative suggestions. That could even be to leave things as they are. Of course one needs to be able to properly justify and explain ones views and opinions. One can't simply reply with "leave it be" and expect to be taken seriously! Other *hypothetical* options that I am pulling out of the air might include, for example, publishing approximate drop times instead of specific ones thus still requiring some level of checking, suggesting Nominet switch to using the EPP check command rather than the DAC, limiting participation in drop catching to registrars that sign up to using a special EPP hostname (similar to the ROR) and potentially making that chargeable per annum or per month (flat fee, no tiered access) replacing the current annual fee for the DAC. What might a reasonable monthly fee, for using a drop catching only EPP hostname which might make multi tagging more unattractive, be? Auctions are clearly out of the question. I believe well thought out responses will be taken seriously. If you don't, okay.
I think you missed the point. The amount of people entering wouldn't increase - just the tags. If each tag gives you a 1% increased chance, for example, then people who multitag would weigh up the cost of new tags against the increased chance rate and likely selling price of domains.
Anyway this is all hypothetical - we have no idea what nominet are going to do. Just they have *never* introduced anything that has been beneficial for anyone except themselves and the top 5 tags.
From what I've read the intention is it wouldn't be random anymore. Firstly a daily drop list would negate the need for list building which is a waste of resources due to huge numbers of DNS queries and domain name availability checks sent.
Can't be sure. Depends how many EPP Create requests are sent at the moment for contested domain names by all registrars who participate and notice a domain names availability. If drop timestamps are published my thinking is that number of EPP creates would reduce.
Will Nominet release additional useful information in such a droplist from UKDC and traffic profiles for each domain? I suspect not, as this seems to be missing from the consultation.
I suggest that you pop out of the Nominet bubble, and have a look at what "world class registries" actually do. Verisign is undoubtedly such a registry, how many ICANN registrars are there that exist solely for drop catching? The more EPP creates that are sent, the more likely you are to catch the name, SnapNames rent other registrar connections, and apparently only 0.05% (1 in 2000) of the creates they send are successful...
You have also neglected to mention one very important difference, because perhaps you don't know enough about the process. Verisign don't publish the exact drop times of any domain names scheduled to drop. There is a release window (i.e. a period of time during which all the domain names due to be released are dropped that day) and this is why ICANN accredited registrars compete by sending large numbers of EPP Creates to the registry, attempting to register those domain names. If everyone knew the exact times every domain name would be deleted by Verisign one wouldn't need to send anywhere near as many EPP Creates.
You have neglected to mention one very important difference, because perhaps you don't know enough about the process. The
order domains are dropped by Verisign is not random, and there are many research papers on this subject. I yet again suggest that you look at what others do, and stop telling others that they are wrong, and only you are right.
Guys, there would be no need to argue, or even worry about drop times or EPP creates, if Nominet just did the obvious thing and published the droplist, invited £50 bids, which in turn would trigger an auction for a small number of specific domains.
Problem sorted.
They can even nominate a third party to run the auctions if they're sniffy about doing it themselves.
Or if they don't want any financial benefits they could donate all sums above the normal reg price to charity.
The whole droplist concept is insane because it's just not necessary.
Guys, there would be no need to argue, or even worry about drop times or EPP creates, if Nominet just did the obvious thing and published the droplist, invited £50 bids, which in turn would trigger an auction for a small number of specific domains.
Problem sorted.
They can even nominate a third party to run the auctions if they're sniffy about doing it themselves.
Or if they don't want any financial benefits they could donate all sums above the normal reg price to charity.
The whole droplist concept is insane because it's just not necessary.
As someone who used my system before going it alone please tell me where I controlled your quota, or where I controlled how/when you chase, or where I controlled *what* you chase?
You might not control what clients chase, but you could pool resources of those chasing the same name such that they maximise the chance of one of them register the name successfully, maybe that's what @Katch! is referring to?