- Joined
- Mar 26, 2007
- Posts
- 2,393
- Reaction score
- 147
my wifes always wanted to start up her own taxi company that uses only female taxi drivers, lots of pink taxis
she wouldnt ever get in a taxi on her own
How was she planning to get around employment discrimination laws? There is no legit argument you can make as to why you need female drivers and men are not suitable...
Isn't there currently a loophole to allow for this, same as the insurance loophole for female only insurance policies? The latter recently had a nail in the coffin in Europe, so maybe the taxi situation could be changed too!
"The Court banned the practice from December 21, 2012. The date was chosen as it is the fifth anniversdary of the introduction of European Union: Directive 2004/ 113/EC1, which prohibits all discrimination based on sex in the accessto and supply of goods and services."
There is a massive difference . The insurance companies can prove that males are a higher risk and wanted to quote as such. That taxi thing is nothing more than someone saying they dont want to employ males, with no valid reason as to why
But on that basis, it could also be argued that the ratio of convcted male / female rapist or murderers would also show males as a much higher offender rate than a female - I would even go as far to say that the difference is even larger than the risk comparison of male / female drivers.
How often do you hear of a female committing either act ?
...I bought the website of a now closed down company who touted themselves as "the uk's best Gay only travel agency". I wonder how long I'd have lasted if I set up a "No Queers Travel Agency"...
Well if you were taking out an insurance policy against ever being convicted of rape/murder, I would expect men to be quoted higher too...
The chance of being killed/raped by a taxi driver who came to pick you up from a pre arranged booking (and wasn't an illegal taxi) is so close to non existent its not even relevant...
He just happened to be a taxi driver. I don't think he was running his meter when he was out shooting up Cumbria.
Although it seems to be perfectly acceptable to discriminate against people... as long as they're white, christian, male and straight. .
I know this
I was waiting for Frog to take the bait - I like reading his debates on here![]()
Yes. In my opinion it doesn't warrant any changes. Unfortunately the idea that there might be a taxi driver murderer, or a white van man murderer, or some-other-kind-of lone-person-that-can-be-stereotyped murderer out on the loose does attract big headlines. Anyway nobody is on the loose in this situation so the media will have to focus on something else from tomorrow.
Yes. In my opinion it doesn't warrant any changes. Unfortunately the idea that there might be a taxi driver murderer, or a white van man murderer, or some-other-kind-of lone-person-that-can-be-stereotyped murderer out on the loose does attract big headlines. Anyway nobody is on the loose in this situation so the media will have to focus on something else from tomorrow (and someone else who's bored will have to start another thread with a "oh my god" subject and a link to a news web site).
Lol
Okay what is the difference in these situations... apart from one apparently being completely acceptable and the other being a direct route to hate mail and national newspaper coverage.
Someone setting up a womens only taxi company, as their customers say they feel safer as statistically they are less likely to be raped. I don't think anyone can argue with the fact that a man is more likely to rape someone.
Someone else setting up a taxi company which refuses to employ Muslims, as their customers say they feel safer not traveling with them in case of suicide bombs. I don't think anyone can argue with the fact that a muslim is more likely to blow themself up in a terror related incident.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.