Junk trafficing

[FC Domains]

I'm feeling guilty.

Last night on Jonathan Ross a web site address was miss-quoted. So today I've had 480 type ins, but very few clicks. I've changed the keyword and now I'm getting 20% clicks. Great, but I know that they are all irrelevant.

It's tricking the punters and the advertisers. There must be a way of selecting truly relevant links. In the long term that's the only way this scam will survive.

 

[domaingenius]

I'm feeling guilty.

Last night on Jonathan Ross a web site address was miss-quoted. So today I've had 480 type ins, but very few clicks. I've changed the keyword and now I'm getting 20% clicks. Great, but I know that they are all irrelevant.

It's tricking the punters and the advertisers. There must be a way of selecting truly relevant links. In the long term that's the only way this scam will survive.

What scam ?

DG

 

[NameDriver]

Hi FCD,

I assume you're referring to Jonathan Ross scamming the BBC out of an 18 million quid contract...? Maybe not, big JR fan, I am.
If you'd like us to set the related searches, then I can gladly help you out there. However, we have no other control over the ads which appear on the page than the keyword you select.
Let me know if you'd like me to change anything at all.

Ed