Apologies for ramble ! Typing on pda. At first glance this does look dodgy ! However, at the risk of contradicting what I said yesterday about Nintendo, I'm really not sure about this one. Yes, Ipad is a trademark, for sure. But I'm not sure its passing off. If you make it clear that you are in no way representing Apple, you are offering a service for a protected good, which may not be prohibited under the class actions. I think you would have to check with the IPO. As a crude example, you obviously couldnt market e-readers on there ! insurance for a protected product I'm not so sure about though. Wasn't there a famous case about car parts recently (volvo?) ? this is completely different to passing off as Nintendo,for example,in my view. But I certainly stand to be corrected on this by others on here !
<Added> As a rule, however, I'd steer clear of trademarked terms in domain names. You may win a dispute, but it does have major headache potential, because people often see things differently, and even though here you may win, you'll have to defend yourself.