The two possible outcomes were never in any way even remotely "symmetrical" in their consequences.
We have chaos in government, in opposition, in the economy and in Europe because the result was Leave. None of those things would have happened if we had voted Remain instead. There may be new opportunities too, but those are months or much more likely years away. But the chaos is here NOW, and it's here to stay.
Consequently, I would have expected far less coverage if we'd voted Remain. Why? Because the Government would have carried on the business of government, and the Opposition the business of opposing them. Companies wouldn't now be desperately scrabbling for contingency plans, they'd be carrying on providing the goods or services just like they always had. Scientists wouldn't be tearing their hair out wondering where the funding and cooperation opportunities will come from in future. And so on, and so on. There is virtually no aspect of professional life that Leave doesn't disrupt, often to a tremendous degree.
I can understand and appreciate that a Remain result would have been devastating for Leavers (in the sense they would have felt totally gutted and distraught about it, probably for a long time, and it would have exacerbated the sense of disconnect between politics and the needs of "real people") but it would not have had even a tiny fraction of the wider disruptive effect that the Leave result has had and will continue to have...