- Joined
- Apr 5, 2005
- Posts
- 9,851
- Reaction score
- 1,337
Firstly, I do understand that different folks have different models. Horses for courses, and all that.
However, the problem with selling domain names at firesale prices (which is the situation, if you're talking about £xx sales) is that the model is not sustainable. It may help you dispose of inventory very quickly, but if you wanted to replenish that inventory in today's markets, whether from catches or on the aftermarket, it would almost certainly cost you more than the proceeds from the original sales.
So it's a perfectly valid model if the aim is to make some relatively quick cash and then "get out" but probably not if you want a business that will keep ticking over for years to come.
The other problem with posting large lists of names for people to cherry-pick at a low price is that you end up with fewer and fewer "winners" and more and more middle-of-the-road inventory. So as time goes on, there's less and less that you can firesale quickly when it's time to pay some more bills.
It's the old domain industry math problem...
http://www.acorndomains.co.uk/new-domainers/87951-domain-industry-math.html
They are broadly comparable, if you slide the "price" dial further to the right for .com. The better the name, the further you would need to slide it (e.g. Business.co.uk is probably a mid-£xxx,xxx name whereas Business.com went for $7,500,000 last time it sold, and would probably fetch that today if it were undeveloped but being sold as is)
After all, the UK online marketing spend is one of the highest in both absolute and percentage terms of any major economy, with 1 in every 4 advertising pounds currently being spent online.
At the same time, sales are cascading from offline to online like a fire hose. This report paints a clear, compelling picture:
http://econsultancy.com/uk/blog/7065-what-is-behind-these-christmas-2010-growth-figures
The fact that some (many?) small businesses are struggling doesn't mean we should lose fact of the bigger picture: there's a TON of money being spent online, and that pile of cash is growing faster than ever.
However, the problem with selling domain names at firesale prices (which is the situation, if you're talking about £xx sales) is that the model is not sustainable. It may help you dispose of inventory very quickly, but if you wanted to replenish that inventory in today's markets, whether from catches or on the aftermarket, it would almost certainly cost you more than the proceeds from the original sales.
So it's a perfectly valid model if the aim is to make some relatively quick cash and then "get out" but probably not if you want a business that will keep ticking over for years to come.
The other problem with posting large lists of names for people to cherry-pick at a low price is that you end up with fewer and fewer "winners" and more and more middle-of-the-road inventory. So as time goes on, there's less and less that you can firesale quickly when it's time to pay some more bills.
It's the old domain industry math problem...
http://www.acorndomains.co.uk/new-domainers/87951-domain-industry-math.html
I do believe: we as domain resellers have some responsibility in trying our best to recognise the true current position and operating difficulties that many UK companies seem to find in bringing any sort of web presence to the UK market. To try and compare the .com Tld market in pricing and potential value to say the .co.uk ccld market is not good for the overall increasing sales and presence. Indeed some seem to think the markets are even "comparable" - and I don't see this as a good direction at all.
They are broadly comparable, if you slide the "price" dial further to the right for .com. The better the name, the further you would need to slide it (e.g. Business.co.uk is probably a mid-£xxx,xxx name whereas Business.com went for $7,500,000 last time it sold, and would probably fetch that today if it were undeveloped but being sold as is)
After all, the UK online marketing spend is one of the highest in both absolute and percentage terms of any major economy, with 1 in every 4 advertising pounds currently being spent online.
At the same time, sales are cascading from offline to online like a fire hose. This report paints a clear, compelling picture:
http://econsultancy.com/uk/blog/7065-what-is-behind-these-christmas-2010-growth-figures
The fact that some (many?) small businesses are struggling doesn't mean we should lose fact of the bigger picture: there's a TON of money being spent online, and that pile of cash is growing faster than ever.
Last edited: