It went beyond that, it was actually very nasty
Untrue.
"perhaps as you’re not used to being challenged"
What was actually stated: "Your decision to stand isn’t being criticised and is welcomed. In my opinion you seem to lack having done basic research about the one main issue you repeatedly reference and, when presented with discourse and evidence contrary to your views, you elect not to respond to it
perhaps as you’re not used to being challenged to the extent you might have to consider rethinking your statements or opinions."
"you’re uncomfortable with yourself."
What was actually stated: "I presume you are intelligent enough to accept that people aren’t oblivious. Consequentially, and in my opinion, your choice never to mention it at all (I am certainly not talking about mentioning it all the time)
might infer to some that
you’re uncomfortable with yourself."
What was actually stated: "You haven’t mention the
“I wanted to guard against any negative questions, designed to marginalise me, because I may challenge the status quo...” part. Everyone attending the Q&A will receive the same questions. I am sad
you feel unable to cope with that in a live environment, as I will be about anyone else who decided not to participate either.
"you dominated discussion in birmingham"
What was actually stated: "One person has told me he felt
you dominated discussion at the Birmingham consultation last year but he often likes to be the centre of attention so maybe you pipped him to the post that day. I wasn’t there to observe."
"because you didn't make an issue of your gender you clearly have an issue with it"
(paraphrasing)
What was actually stated: "I accept your point that you might not want it to be an issue *for you* but by not featuring yourself in your own video in vision, by not attending the live Q&A session and by having never mentioned your gender once in passing here as far as I know, I feel you also aren’t contributing to it not becoming an issue in the minds of some when it’s conspicuous. Clearly your choice but you are now kindly asking to be elected to a Board of Directors of a medium sized company and some voters might like to know you’re self confident and comfortable in yourself *in person* by seeing how you actually come across *as the person you are*, not through published word only. Many of them won’t be AcornDomains members."
These things aren't said by chance they're meant to unnerve, cause self-doubt and anxiety
I can't say it's personal because sadly he seems to do it to everyone
I don't think any of the above was asked unfairly and certainly none of it was said derogatorily. One shouldn't feel unable to ask questions that might be awkward when they directly relate to factual issues at hand. Susannah herself has repeatedly stated that she isn't afraid to do the same. Remain respectful and don't be ashamed of asking what some might consider to be difficult questions if you ask them with a genuine reason. If you don't accept my reasonings as already stated then that's your prerogatives.
Who the fuck do you think you are!?
Fuck your iq and fuck your Britishness!
This is completely unrelated, unsolicited, and a personal matter; one could even find it offensive and discriminatory.
No, most normal people don't think about what you raised and really don't care.
You have a problem with Bulgarians, now transgenders... anyone that doesn't look like you I assume.
When is your next ukip party meeting?
Fuck you you twat!
* you can ban me from this forum, I don't care anymore
This is absolutely incorrect. I have no problem with Bulgarians (and have never suggested I did). I have no problem with transgenders, transexuals or transvestites either on the basis of those statuses (and also never suggested that I did).