Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.

Carphone Warehouse gets domain name revenge on Stelios

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is a good ruling for "us" as Blunt is obviously a QC/Barrister and has by the looks of it used the UK Laws rather than the Nominet rules to make his decision. This will make it harder for other "Easy Groups" or similar to take advantage of the Nominet rules being out of kilter with UK laws.
DG
 
domaingenius said:
This is a good ruling for "us" as Blunt is obviously a QC/Barrister and has by the looks of it used the UK Laws rather than the Nominet rules to make his decision. This will make it harder for other "Easy Groups" or similar to take advantage of the Nominet rules being out of kilter with UK laws.
DG
Not at all. David Blunt was deciding this under the Nominet DRS, and as always UK law applies to the DRS. The decision is at:
http://www.nominet.org.uk/DisputeResolution/Decisions/Drs02599Easiermobile.html

Easy Group lost on the basis of rights (see para 41 if you don't want to read it all). If you look at Nominet's definition (in the DRS Policy http://www.nic.uk/DisputeResolution/DrsPolicy/) of "rights" it is "... rights enforceable under English law" so Nominet can't be out of step with the general law.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Rule #1: Be Respectful

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Premium Members

New Threads

Domain Forum Friends

Our Mods' Businesses

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • Siusaidh AcornBot:
    Siusaidh has left the room.
      Siusaidh AcornBot: Siusaidh has left the room.
      Top Bottom